Event Details
January 01, 2015
Description
Opinion issued in the case U.S. v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider | person | 47 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021110.jpg
This legal document argues that a District Court's interpretation of statute § 3283 is flawed because it relies on misinterpreted legal precedent. The author contends the court, following a Third Circuit opinion, improperly applied a quote from the *Dodge* case, which concerned a different statute (SORNA), to invent a legislative history for § 3283 that does not exist.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The case of *United States v. Schneider*, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015) is cited as a Third Circuit decision that reached the same conclusion as *Weingarten*.
2015-01-01
Legal case: United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186
2015-01-01 • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Citation to a Third Circuit decision in Schneider, which applied a case-specific analysis to Section 3283.
Date unknown • Third Circuit
The ruling in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 197.
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
The 3d Circuit court ruled in United States v. Schneider.
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
U.S. v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 2015)
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
U.S. v. Schneider, C.A. No. 10-29, 2010 WL 3656027 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 15, 2010)
2010-09-15 • E.D. Pa.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event