Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Citation to a Third Circuit decision in Schneider, which applied a case-specific analysis to Section 3283.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider | person | 47 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021707.jpg
This legal document presents an argument against Maxwell's interpretation of Section 3283 of the U.S. Code. The author refutes Maxwell's claim that the phrase "offense involving" requires a narrow, elements-based analysis, citing precedents like *Weingarten* and *Nijhawan* to support a broader, circumstance-specific approach. The document distinguishes the cases cited by Maxwell by arguing they involved different statutory language, specifically definitions of a "crime of violence," which are not present here.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The case of *United States v. Schneider*, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015) is cited as a Third Circuit decision that reached the same conclusion as *Weingarten*.
2015-01-01
Legal case: United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186
2015-01-01 • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
The ruling in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 197.
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
The 3d Circuit court ruled in United States v. Schneider.
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
U.S. v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 2015)
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
U.S. v. Schneider, C.A. No. 10-29, 2010 WL 3656027 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 15, 2010)
2010-09-15 • E.D. Pa.
Opinion issued in the case U.S. v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196.
2015-01-01 • 3d Cir.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event