Date Unknown
Voir dire (jury selection) where it was learned that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, had been involved in a personal injury lawsuit.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | person | 115 | View Entity |
| Catherine Conrad | person | 154 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010081.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the questioning of an individual named Edelstein. The questioning focuses on Edelstein's awareness of a juror's (Catherine Conrad) past involvement in a lawsuit, information received from Theresa Trzaskoma via a Westlaw report, and the subsequent decision to hire Nardello to investigate after receiving a 'juror letter'.
Events with shared participants
A witness named Edelstein is questioned about a decision made with Susan Brune to omit information from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Susan Brune decided to omit information about a juror note and a suspended lawyer from a legal brief they were preparing.
Date unknown
Letter from Catherine Conrad to Stanley J. Oklua [sic], Esq.
2011-05-25
Certificate of Disposition for the case 'People v. Catherine Conrad'.
1998-08-21 • Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A witness, Edelstein, is questioned by an attorney about their knowledge of Catherine Conrad's professional status.
Date unknown
A discussion about whether computer research on Ms. Conrad could have been performed on May 12th.
0012-05-01
Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness (Edelstein) that there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
A question-and-answer session where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the intent and content of a legal brief.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event