Date Unknown
The witness, Ms. Conrad, participated in the voir dire (jury selection) process for the trial.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009951.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who admits to perjuring herself during the jury selection (voir dire) process. The questioning focuses on her awareness of potential perjury charges, her receipt of use immunity, and her motivations for wanting to be on the jury, which she explains was for the 'interesting trial experience' and to get 'back in the swing of things' after a suspension.
Events with shared participants
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Voir dire (jury selection) commenced for the trial.
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to bar authorities on February 26th that she lived in the Bronx.
Date unknown
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Witness Conrad was sworn to give a deposition under oath.
2009-03-24
Cross-examination of juror Conrad regarding her voir dire statements.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
The date Ms. Conrad's legal career was 'destroyed' when she was suspended.
2007-12-18
The voir dire (jury selection process) where Ms. Conrad made statements that are now being questioned.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of a witness/juror named Conrad regarding false statements made during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event