Event Details
Not specified
Description
DOJ objection to Section 109 of an Act, which would authorize the President to establish an award for efforts against trafficking, seen by DOJ as interfering with presidential authority.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| President Grant | person | 17 | View Entity |
| DOJ (Department of Justice) | organization | 432 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis objecting to three sections of a proposed anti-trafficking act. The DOJ argues against Section 107 on separation of powers grounds, Section 108 for proposing a logistically difficult and insecure interagency database, and Section 109 for interfering with the President's policy-making authority. The document is part of a larger collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' but does not contain any specific information about Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ensure' regarding government-funded counsel for victims.
Date unknown
DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing conflict of interest concerns and existing procedures under 18 U.S.C. §3509(h).
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22 U.S.C. 7105(b)(2)(B) to allow OJP to better allocate funds for trafficking victims.
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are included with HHS in the development of a $5,000,000 Pilot Program.
Date unknown
Analysis of a bill concerning trafficking, specifically Section 214 and its subsections.
Date unknown
The Administration's proposal in the 2008 Budget to consolidate DOJ's grant programs.
2008-01-01
The Department of Justice (DOJ) states its opposition to several subsections of Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims.
Date unknown • N/A
The Department of Justice analyzed and stated its opposition to several provisions within a proposed bill, specifically Section 214 and its subsections, related to funding and programs for trafficking victims.
Date unknown • United States
DOJ conducts trainings for law enforcement and other audiences on the issue of trafficking in persons, including training on juvenile victims through the Innocence Lost National Initiative.
Date unknown • N/A
Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event