Event Details
Unknown (Past)
Description
Conversation between Brune and Trzaskoma regarding the vetting of Juror No. 1.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Ms. Trzaskoma | person | 103 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010021.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The testimony centers on a past conversation between Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding 'Juror No. 1,' specifically investigating whether the juror was actually a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Brune testifies that they concluded it was 'inconceivable' for a lawyer to lie under oath about their identity and denies that a Westlaw report was mentioned during their conversation.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Investigation requested by Ms. Trzaskoma.
0012-05-01 • Unknown
A discussion was held regarding Catherine Conrad's potential status as a suspended lawyer, prompted by Ms. Trzaskoma. The group reviewed voir dire responses and decided against further research.
Date unknown
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event