Unknown (Transcript filed 02/24/22)
Cross-examination of Mr. Berke regarding attorney ethics and reporting juror misconduct.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berke | person | 33 | View Entity |
| Unidentified Questioner | person | 25 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009431.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Berke. The questioning focuses on legal ethics, specifically asking Berke if an attorney is obligated to report juror misconduct to the Court. Berke attempts to qualify his answer rather than giving a simple 'yes' or 'no,' stating he relies on ethical rules and commentary when such issues arise.
Events with shared participants
An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of various people and events related to a case involving Epstein.
2017-07-26
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of witness Hesse regarding their part-time employment.
Date unknown • Court
Cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding a study on grooming behaviors.
2025-01-15 • Southern District Court (implied)
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke.
2022-03-22
A past conversation recalled by Berke where it was noted that Juror No. 1 had been a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
Date unknown
Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding the travel habits of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Cross-examination of a witness named Berke regarding an assessment of possible juror misconduct.
2022-03-24 • Southern District Court (implied)
A question-and-answer session (redirect examination of Brune) regarding the contents of a document listing addresses, lawsuits, and household members.
Date unknown
Attorney Mr. Okula cross-examines witness Berke during a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event