Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The Court refused to give the jury a supplemental instruction as requested by the defense.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense | organization | 240 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021142.jpg
This legal document argues that Maxwell's conviction on Count Four (substantive transportation) was likely improper. The argument posits that the jury convicted her based on arranging a return flight for 'Jane' from New Mexico after the alleged sexual abuse had already occurred, and the Court's refusal to provide a clarifying instruction allowed this. This potential error also casts doubt on the validity of the conviction for a related conspiracy charge, Count Three.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Tentative trial date set by the court.
2020-06-08 • Courtroom
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
A trial where the Government plans to use certain statements and evidence, which is the subject of the defense's motion.
Date unknown
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
The defense submitted a financial report showing the defendant has approximately $22 million in assets.
Date unknown • Court
A rebuttal is given by Ms. Comey in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Date unknown • Court
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Government's motion, which the defense is largely ignoring precedent for
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event