Event Details

July 19, 2025

Description

The White House press secretary announced the President had directed the AG to request the unsealing of Epstein-related grand jury files.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
White House press secretary person 2 View Entity
The President person 93 View Entity
Attorney General person 138 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg

legal document • 834 KB
View

This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.

1926-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.

1946-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.

1988-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it opposed in order to allow for judicial review.

1983-01-01 • United States

View

Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute while the Justice Department simultaneously attacked its constitutionality in court.

1988-01-01 • United States

View

The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

The President refused to comply with provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act, viewing them as unconstitutional.

Date unknown

View

The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.

1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit

View

The memorandum was declassified by order of the President.

2018-02-02 • United States

View

Issuance of Executive Order 13496, mentioned as a related administrative action mandating federal contractors post NLRA rights notices.

2009-02-04 • United States

View

Event Metadata

Type
announcement
Location
White House
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg
Date String
2025-07-19

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event