July 19, 2025
The White House press secretary announced the President had directed the AG to request the unsealing of Epstein-related grand jury files.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| White House press secretary | person | 2 | View Entity |
| The President | person | 93 | View Entity |
| Attorney General | person | 138 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.
Events with shared participants
Supreme Court case: Myers v. United States. The President refused to enforce a limitation on his removal power, and the Supreme Court vindicated the President's interpretation.
1926-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: United States v. Lovett. The President enforced a statute to withhold compensation from employees, despite believing it was unconstitutional, while the Justice Department argued against its constitutionality.
1946-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case: Morrison v. Olson. The Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute, which the President viewed as unconstitutional, while the Justice Department attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case INS v. Chadha, where the executive branch enforced a legislative veto it opposed in order to allow for judicial review.
1983-01-01 • United States
Supreme Court case Morrison v. Olson, where the Attorney General enforced the independent counsel statute while the Justice Department simultaneously attacked its constitutionality in court.
1988-01-01 • United States
The Ninth Circuit court ruled in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman (842 F.2d 1102), rejecting the President's constitutional arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
The President refused to comply with provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act, viewing them as unconstitutional.
Date unknown
The Ninth Circuit issues its initial ruling in Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman, 842 F.2d 1102, rejecting the President's constitutionality arguments and finding Lear Siegler was a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees.
1988-01-01 • Ninth Circuit
The memorandum was declassified by order of the President.
2018-02-02 • United States
Issuance of Executive Order 13496, mentioned as a related administrative action mandating federal contractors post NLRA rights notices.
2009-02-04 • United States
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event