Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A three-month long trial for which the jury selection discussed in the document was conducted.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jurors | person | 122 | View Entity |
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009336.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding the jury selection (voir dire) process for a lengthy, three-month trial. The questioning focuses on the decision not to challenge a potential juror with a criminal history and confirms that juror availability was a significant issue, which Judge Pauley addressed with the jury pool from the beginning.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
The speaker, likely a judge, outlines the procedure for the voir dire (jury selection) process, specifically how to question prospective jurors using a list of names of witnesses and entities.
2021-12-08 • Court
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of Mr. Parkinson during which the Court and Ms. Comey discuss the viewing and admission of Government Exhibits (GX252, GX253, GX254, GX241) by the jurors. Exhibit 241 is admitted under seal.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
The trial in the case of United States v. Guzman Loera, where the jury was repeatedly instructed to avoid media coverage.
Date unknown • district court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
The document discusses the legal standard for when a hearing to question a jury is warranted, arguing against one in the current case.
Date unknown • court
The period during which the jury discusses the case to reach a verdict. The document sets strict rules for juror conduct during this time.
Date unknown • jury room
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event