This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding the jury selection (voir dire) process for a lengthy, three-month trial. The questioning focuses on the decision not to challenge a potential juror with a criminal history and confirms that juror availability was a significant issue, which Judge Pauley addressed with the jury pool from the beginning.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The person being questioned in a direct examination, addressed as "Ms. Brune".
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who presided over the voir dire process and questioned jurors about their availability for a l...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
"We had to make choices among the panel and he wasn't my favorite, but we did not use a challenge for him."Source
"The availability issue was a big one during voir dire."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,440 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document