Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Voir dire process during which Juror No. 50 allegedly provided false answers.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009883.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is part of a motion on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing for a new trial. The central claim is that she does not need to prove that Juror No. 50's false answers during jury selection were deliberately made. The document cites multiple legal precedents to support the argument that even an honest but mistaken answer from a juror can be grounds for a new trial, especially when it raises questions of juror bias.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The process where potential jurors, including Juror No. 50, were questioned. The document discusses how Juror No. 50 answered Question 48 during this time.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Juror No. 50 publicly discussed his beliefs about the science of memory, stating that his own memory is like a video-tape.
Date unknown • Media
A jury returned its verdict in a case, less than one week before January 4, 2022.
2022-01-04
Lucia Osborne-Crowley interviewed Juror No. 50 for an article.
2022-01-04
The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50.
2022-01-04
Juror No. 50 was a victim of sexual assault and abuse.
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 revealed his experience with abuse to the jury, which was fundamental to the verdict.
Date unknown • jury room
The jury selection process during which Juror No. 50 allegedly provided false answers.
Date unknown • Court
Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 engaged in a publicity tour, giving multiple interviews to news outlets.
2022-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event