Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Sentencing of David Parse for his role in tax shelter-related transactions.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| William H. Pauley, III | person | 48 | View Entity |
| ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP | organization | 44 | View Entity |
| David Parse | person | 96 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009517.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III dated March 7, 2013, argues for a lenient sentence for their client, David Parse. The letter contends that Parse's role was limited to that of a broker executing trades, not designing or marketing illegal tax shelters, and that the sentencing guidelines are too harsh for his level of culpability. It further notes that of all the brokers performing similar functions for the law firm Jenkins, only Parse and Craig Brubaker were prosecuted, with Parse being the only one convicted.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Defendant David Parse’s Motion For Judgment Of Acquittal Pursuant To Rule 29
2011-06-07
David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.
2011-05-24
Multiple letters sent from Daniel Aronoff to David Parse.
2000-12-19
David Parse swears to the document before a notary.
2012-08-03 • Illinois
David Parse swore to and signed a document before Notary Public William B Kavanagh.
2012-08-03 • STATE OF ILLINOIS
A previous trial involving David Parse and other defendants.
Date unknown • this courtroom
Complex and varied transactions were effectuated to change the results of three sets of transactions for tax purposes for Coleman and Blair.
Date unknown
Prosecution of brokers who performed functions for Jenkins and other law firms.
Date unknown
Fraudulent backdating of transactions was committed to achieve impermissible tax results, in violation of the annual accounting rule.
Date unknown • Deutsche Bank (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event