Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Juror No. 50 gave false answers to questions 25 and 48 during voir dire, specifically about his social media usage.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009742.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror No. 50 intentionally provided false answers during voir dire, particularly concerning his use of social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The document contends that this pattern of dishonesty, combined with his post-trial media engagement, casts doubt on the truthfulness of all his answers, including those meant to screen for bias against the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. It also mentions a letter from the government, published by the media, which is described as an attempt to silence the juror and circumvent court rules.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The process where potential jurors, including Juror No. 50, were questioned. The document discusses how Juror No. 50 answered Question 48 during this time.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Juror No. 50 publicly discussed his beliefs about the science of memory, stating that his own memory is like a video-tape.
Date unknown • Media
A jury returned its verdict in a case, less than one week before January 4, 2022.
2022-01-04
Lucia Osborne-Crowley interviewed Juror No. 50 for an article.
2022-01-04
The Independent published an article based on the interview with Juror No. 50.
2022-01-04
Juror No. 50 was a victim of sexual assault and abuse.
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 revealed his experience with abuse to the jury, which was fundamental to the verdict.
Date unknown • jury room
The jury selection process during which Juror No. 50 allegedly provided false answers.
Date unknown • Court
Juror No. 50 sat for an interview as part of an hour-long documentary called “Ghislaine, Prince Andrew and the Paedophile.”
Date unknown
Juror No. 50 engaged in a publicity tour, giving multiple interviews to news outlets.
2022-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event