Event Details
July 08, 2011
Description
Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Defendants' Motion For A New Trial Or, In The Alternative, For An Evidentiary Hearing Concerning Juror No. 1
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
| Juror No. 1 | person | 133 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009910.jpg
This document is an index page (page vii) from a court filing, listing various evidentiary exhibits labeled GX (Government Exhibits) and DX (Defense Exhibits). The exhibits include correspondence from 1998-2003 involving individuals such as Lisa Hurley, James Beumel, and Erwin Mayer, as well as internal communications involving Deutsche Bank and Jenkens & Gilchrist (J&G). The document also lists legal motions from 2011 regarding a new trial and evidentiary hearing concerning 'Juror No. 1'.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A jury asked for a judge's clarification on legal terms ("willfully" and "knowingly") during deliberations regarding David Parse.
2011-05-24
David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.
2011-05-24
A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.
2022-02-24 • Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York
The government conducted a Google search on Juror No. 1 after she received a letter.
Date unknown
An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.
Date unknown
On the third day of jury deliberations, Juror No. 11 needed an emergency medical procedure and was excused, replaced by an alternate, and the jury was instructed to restart deliberations.
2012-05-16
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event