February 12, 2020
Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order denying the request for a pre-motion conference as moot and permitting the Defendant to file a motion to dismiss.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indyke | person | 99 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe 1000 | person | 108 | View Entity |
| Lewis J. Liman | person | 12 | View Entity |
028.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated February 12, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke, et al. Judge Lewis J. Liman denied a request for a pre-motion conference as moot, allowing the Defendant to proceed directly with filing a motion to dismiss.
Events with shared participants
Filing of a civil case, Doe 3 v. Indyke.
Date unknown • S.D.N.Y.
The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.
Date unknown
The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.
Date unknown
Jane Doe met Epstein at his New York City mansion on 71st Street for the first time.
Date unknown • 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY
Order Granting Motion to Stay in Doe v. Indyke et al.
2020-09-14 • Court (Case No. 20-cv-00484)
Epstein and Maxwell simultaneously sexually assaulted Jane Doe with sex toys in the master bedroom.
Date unknown • 9 East 71st Street, New York, NY
Order Granting Motion to Stay in Doe v. Indyke
2020-09-14 • Court
Legal Conference
2021-12-21 • Southern District of New York
Transcript of Premotion Conference, Farmer v. Indyke, et al., No. 19-cv-10475 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y.)
2020-03-05 • S.D.N.Y.
Deadline for Plaintiff to file response to motion to dismiss
2020-03-30 • USDC SDNY
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event