Date Unknown
Filing of a civil case, Doe 3 v. Indyke.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doe 3 | person | 7 | View Entity |
| Indyke | person | 99 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
Events with shared participants
The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.
Date unknown
The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.
Date unknown
Order Granting Motion to Stay in Doe v. Indyke et al.
2020-09-14 • Court (Case No. 20-cv-00484)
Order Granting Motion to Stay in Doe v. Indyke
2020-09-14 • Court
Legal Conference
2021-12-21 • Southern District of New York
Transcript of Premotion Conference, Farmer v. Indyke, et al., No. 19-cv-10475 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y.)
2020-03-05 • S.D.N.Y.
Original deadline for Defendants' reply papers
2020-03-30 • SDNY
Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order denying the request for a pre-motion conference as moot and permitting the Defendant to file a motion to dismiss.
2020-02-12 • New York, New York
Intensive legal visits for Jeffrey Epstein.
2019-08-05 • MCC New York
Legal visits for Jeffrey Epstein.
2019-08-02 • MCC New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event