Unknown
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | person | 289 | View Entity |
| attorney | person | 20 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00015009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on a scientific study regarding 'sexual grooming' and 'pre-offense behaviors,' specifically discussing methodology where 18 people were used to narrow a list of 77 items down to 42. The witness validates that the study in question established the content validity of a sexual grooming model.
Events with shared participants
Direct examination of a witness named Rocchio as part of a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10
A legal argument is being made to exclude the expert testimony of Rocchio regarding grooming.
Date unknown
A judge addresses a dispute between counsel regarding the scope of questioning during a witness's (Rocchio's) direct examination, ultimately sustaining an objection.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding a study on grooming behaviors.
2025-01-15 • Southern District Court (implied)
Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines the witness, Rocchio, during a court proceeding identified as Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2025-01-15 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding the formation of trust in abusive relationships.
2025-01-15
A witness is being questioned about the concept of 'grooming' in the context of child sexual abuse, its presence in scientific literature, and the basis of their opinions.
2025-01-15 • Southern District (likely New York City)
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio by Mr. Pagliuca regarding academic studies on sexual grooming.
2025-01-15 • Courtroom
The witness (Rocchio) was interviewed by the government. During these interviews, the witness took temporary notes.
Date unknown
A witness named Rocchio is being cross-examined in court about their note-taking practices.
2025-01-15 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event