Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
Juror No. 50 provided false answers to questions, which deprived the Court of a basis for inquiry into his ability to serve impartially.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parties | person | 13 | View Entity |
| Juror No. 50 | person | 232 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues that 'Juror No. 50' gave false answers during jury selection, which prevented the Court from properly assessing his impartiality and potential biases. The filing asserts that truthful answers would have led to the juror's removal. It also notes that the juror has continued to engage in 'media exploits,' including appearing in a documentary on January 18, 2022, despite being represented by counsel in this matter.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Projected start of opening statements.
2021-11-29 • SDNY
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
The speaker, likely a judge, outlines the procedure for the voir dire (jury selection) process, specifically how to question prospective jurors using a list of names of witnesses and entities.
2021-12-08 • Court
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event