Date Unknown
A split verdict was delivered in the case of Mr. Parse. The verdict is said to have tracked the difference between 'wilfully' and 'knowingly'.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Parse | person | 57 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010180.jpg
This document is a court transcript where an attorney, Ms. Davis, argues against a motion for a new trial. She references a letter from Catherine Conrad about jury deliberations concerning David Parse, noting the jury struggled with the legal definitions of 'wilfully' and 'knowingly' but ultimately made a deliberate and informed decision, as evidenced by their verdict on conspiracy and tax evasion counts. The discussion highlights the legal nuances that influenced the jury's split verdict.
Events with shared participants
A jury deliberation resulted in a split verdict and the acquittal of Mr. Parse, which is the subject of the discussion in this transcript.
Date unknown • Jury room
A future sentencing for Mr. Parse is mentioned to be scheduled for January.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Mr. Parse was convicted of three 'backdating' transactions.
Date unknown
The broker reversed the mistaken stock transfers, backdating the correction to December 28.
2025-01-02
An 'avalanche of work' occurred at the end of tax years in December to finalize tax shelter transactions.
2025-12-01 • offices of Mr. Parse
Defendant Mr. Parse was allegedly involved in a corrupt endeavor to obstruct the IRS and in mail fraud, which included backdated transactions.
Date unknown
Redirect examination of witness Mr. Schoeman by attorney Mr. Shechtman.
2012-02-24 • Courtroom
Transactions were implemented by Mr. Parse at Deutsche Bank based on instructions from Jenkins & Gilchrist, which had to be done by the end of the year.
Date unknown
Trial of Mr. Parse
2022-08-24 • Courtroom
Avalanche of work to finalize tax shelter transactions by year end.
2025-12-01 • Offices of Mr. Parse and Carrie Yackee
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event