Event Details
January 01, 2003
Description
Passage of H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 108-63, at 54
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Congress | location | 8 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000132.tif
This document discusses the legislative history and intent behind the PROTECT Act's retroactivity provisions, emphasizing that Congress removed an express retroactivity clause due to constitutional concerns. It cites a Supreme Court case (Stogner v. California) and Senator Leahy's statements to argue that the Act applies to past conduct, like Maxwell's, where the statute of limitations had not yet expired, without violating the Ex Post Facto Clause.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act established authority for TARP.
2008-01-01 • USA
The passage of the federal Bail Reform Act.
1984-01-01
Robert Mueller testimony before Congress
2019-07-01 • Capitol Hill
Enactment of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (referenced in footnote).
2004-01-01 • USA
Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearing
Date unknown • Washington D.C.
President Obama signs H.R. 3547, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, into Public Law 113-76.
2014-01-17 • Washington D.C.
Passage of the Military Commissions Act
2006-01-01 • United States
The legislative history of §3283 originates from the 1986 Sexual Abuse Act.
1986-01-01
Congress amended § 3283 as part of the PROTECT Act, removing the statute of limitations for certain offenses against children.
2003-01-01
Discussion and interpretation of the application of § 3283 statute of limitations, referencing Supreme Court and Circuit Court precedents regarding war frauds and child sex abuse statutes.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event