Event Details

March 01, 2011

Description

Voir dire/Jury selection where Conrad took an oath.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Catherine M. Conrad person 53 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009918.jpg

Court Transcript (Direct Examination) • 889 KB
View

This document contains transcript pages 101-104 from the case United States v. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. The witness, Catherine M. Conrad, a former juror in the case, initially asserts her Fifth Amendment privilege regarding her previous voir dire testimony but is subsequently granted immunity by the Court. Under questioning by attorney Mr. Gair, Conrad admits to lies and omissions during her jury service selection in 2011 and confirms she called Judge Pauley's chambers earlier that morning to state she would not attend court.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad

2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)

View

Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.

2011-06-24

View

Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).

2007-12-18

View

Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).

2010-12-09

View

A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.

Date unknown

View

Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.

2000-01-26 • State of New York

View

The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests from the Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

2007-12-18 • First Judicial Department

View

The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad.

2009-01-01

View

A subsequent re-evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad was conducted.

2010-01-01

View

Catherine M. Conrad is called as a witness, granted use immunity after asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege, and questioned by Mr. Gair. She admits her prior testimony contained lies and omissions.

2012-02-15 • Courtroom

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Courtroom
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-21 00:16

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009918.jpg
Date String
March 1, 2011

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event