March 01, 2011
Voir dire/Jury selection where Conrad took an oath.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. Conrad | person | 53 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009918.jpg
This document contains transcript pages 101-104 from the case United States v. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. The witness, Catherine M. Conrad, a former juror in the case, initially asserts her Fifth Amendment privilege regarding her previous voir dire testimony but is subsequently granted immunity by the Court. Under questioning by attorney Mr. Gair, Conrad admits to lies and omissions during her jury service selection in 2011 and confirms she called Judge Pauley's chambers earlier that morning to state she would not attend court.
Events with shared participants
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Attorney Registration Information for Catherine M. Conrad was recorded.
2011-06-24
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 48 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2007-12-18
Legal case 'In the Matter of Catherine M. Conrad, 80 A.D.3d 187' (1st Dep't).
2010-12-09
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Catherine M. Conrad was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.
2000-01-26 • State of New York
The Court suspended respondent Catherine M. Conrad from the practice of law for failure to respond to requests from the Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
2007-12-18 • First Judicial Department
The Committee obtained a psychiatric evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad.
2009-01-01
A subsequent re-evaluation of respondent Catherine M. Conrad was conducted.
2010-01-01
Catherine M. Conrad is called as a witness, granted use immunity after asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege, and questioned by Mr. Gair. She admits her prior testimony contained lies and omissions.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event