Ms. Moe is the attorney questioning Jane, who is the witness, during a court trial.
Ms. Moe is acting as legal counsel for Jane, making objections on her behalf during the cross-examination.
MS. MOE objects to questions posed to Jane, suggesting she is acting as Jane's legal counsel.
Ms. Moe makes objections on behalf of the witness, Jane, suggesting an attorney-client relationship.
Ms. Moe is likely the prosecuting attorney conducting the direct examination of Jane, a government witness, and presenting government exhibits through her testimony.
Ms. Moe is conducting a redirect examination of Jane, who is a witness in the case.
Ms. Moe is an attorney objecting to questions being asked of the witness, Jane.
MS. MOE, presumably an attorney, makes an objection on behalf of the witness, Jane, during her testimony.
Ms. Moe acts in a protective capacity, likely as Jane's attorney, by objecting to the opposing counsel's line of questioning.
MS. MOE is the attorney conducting the direct examination of the witness, Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00017575.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym "Jane". Jane describes being summoned by a man named Jeffrey from a pool area to his bedroom or massage room. During the testimony, an exhibit containing two pictures of Jane (Government Exhibit 245) is admitted into evidence under seal, consistent with the court's ruling allowing her to use a pseudonym.
DOJ-OGR-00017591.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the testimony of a witness named "Jane." Questioned by attorney Ms. Moe, Jane confirms she has no financial stake in the trial's outcome and explains her desire to remain anonymous as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to protect her private life and career and to avoid public shaming.
DOJ-OGR-00017793.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her recollection of attending Mike Wallace's 80th birthday party, which the questioner suggests occurred in May 1998. Jane confirms she sang "Happy Birthday" but is unsure of other details, while her attorney, Ms. Moe, makes several successful objections.
DOJ-OGR-00017730.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confronts Jane with a prior statement she allegedly made to the government about receiving phone calls from someone named Emmy in Florida when she was a teenager. Jane denies making the statement and claims the written record of it is incorrect, leading to objections from her counsel, Ms. Moe, and rulings from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017705.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies in her prior statements to the government about a trip to New York with Epstein and Maxwell, specifically a trip to see 'The Lion King'. The witness's attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to the line of questioning, which is overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017521.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym "Jane". The witness identifies Government Exhibit 12 as her birth certificate. Following a request from attorney Ms. Moe and with no objection from attorney Ms. Menninger, the judge permits the jury to view the sealed exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00017808.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney, Ms. Moe, questions Jane about her application for admission to Interlochen for the summer of 1994. This application is identified as Defendant's Exhibit J-3, which the court permits the jury to view.
DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney questions Jane about incidents in New York involving Ghislaine Maxwell, and despite objections from another attorney, Jane confirms that she did tell the government about at least one such incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017682.jpg
This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on her past interactions with 'Ghislaine' and 'Epstein' and a statement she allegedly made to the government in December 2019. The witness states she does not recall making the statement and is directed to review a document (3509-005) to refresh her memory.
DOJ-OGR-00017696.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies between her current testimony and prior statements made to the government in 2019 regarding a trip to New York at age 14 where she allegedly met Epstein. Jane denies the accuracy of the statements being presented, and her counsel, Ms. Moe, objects to the line of questioning, with the court sustaining the objection.
Entities connected to both Ms. Moe and Jane
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship