Relationship Details

This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.

This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).