Relationship Details

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the defense summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a key witness's testimony is inconsistent, specifically highlighting that the witness admitted she does not recall Ghislaine Maxwell touching her, giving her massage instructions, or being present during specific sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein, contradicting the government's narrative.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Defense Attorney Ms. Menninger, The Court, and Government Attorney Ms. Moe discussing the procedure for a witness to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. The Court and Defense agree that a simple letter or email from the witness's lawyer is insufficient to invoke these rights, and the Defense intends to ask for the subpoena to be enforced, requiring the witness to appear.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger discusses a third-party witness who has submitted a letter asserting Fifth Amendment privileges to avoid testifying. Menninger argues that the subpoena remains valid and requests the Court enforce it to compel the witness to testify, noting the witness is represented by 'Compton counsel,' a former AUSA.