Relationship Details

This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as the 'Oxford-educated, proper English woman'), filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger attempts to discredit the prosecution's 'culture of silence' theory by noting that household manager Juan Alessi threw away the 'mysterious household manual' and that no other staff testified to using it. The defense also argues that pilot Larry Visoski's nondisclosure agreement was standard practice for wealthy individuals to protect the privacy of famous passengers like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and John Glenn, rather than to conceal illicit sexual activity.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of Annie Farmer. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about her desire to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein in 2006, followed by a redirect examination by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz asking about the impact of Farmer's experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. The page concludes with Farmer beginning to describe her experiences as 'upsetting and confusing'.

This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Menninger argues that the prosecution is attempting to punish Maxwell for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes because he is deceased. She highlights that the government seized nearly 38,000 photographs but only presented a small handful showing Maxwell and Epstein together, questioning what was in the remaining 37,960 photos.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. She argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, questions the credibility of witnesses who added Maxwell to their stories only after hiring personal injury lawyers, and points out discrepancies between testimony and flight logs regarding travel.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the summation (closing argument) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the prosecution's case relies on stories manipulated by personal injury lawyers and motivated by money. She asserts that the government successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator and abuser, but failed to connect those actions to Maxwell.

This document is page 81 of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring the opening of the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the government's case relies on stories fabricated through 'erroneous memories, manipulation, and money' facilitated by personal injury lawyers. The defense contends the prosecution successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator but failed to connect his crimes to Maxwell.

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues that a key witness ('she') has a poor and inconsistent memory, noting the absence of her name in flight logs alongside 'famous people.' Menninger highlights discrepancies between the witness's testimony and her statements in December 2019 and February 2020, where she claimed lack of recollection.

This document is a page from a court transcript (dated August 10, 2022) featuring the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the government failed to record interviews with accusers, preventing the defense from knowing if witnesses were coached. She also attacks witness credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between their testimony and flight logs, and suggesting they added Maxwell to their allegations only after hiring personal injury lawyers.

This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues against the reliability of accuser memories, citing expert Dr. Loftus and discrediting Dr. Rocchio, while asserting that 'money is a powerful manipulator.' The text transitions to discussing the six counts against Maxwell, specifically defining conspiracy as an agreement to violate the law.

This document is a transcript of a closing argument by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues for Maxwell's acquittal on 'Count Six', which relates to an accuser named Carolyn, by attacking Carolyn's credibility and claiming she never traveled to New York as alleged. The attorney also distances Maxwell from any involvement in the travel of another individual, Annie Farmer, to undermine the government's broader conspiracy theory involving Maxwell and Epstein.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the closing arguments (summation) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is instructing the jury on the concept of 'reasonable doubt,' emphasizing that the lack of evidence or missing witnesses should be considered when deciding if the government met its burden of proof. She explicitly states that if such doubt exists, it is the jury's duty to acquit Ms. Maxwell.