Relationship Details

OLC Legal representative CVRA

Connected Entities

Entity A
OLC
Type: organization
Mentions: 84
Also known as: Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), OLC (Office of Legal Counsel), Adams Holcomb LLP, Dolce Gabbana
Entity B
CVRA
Type: organization
Mentions: 17
Also known as: CVRA Subcommittee, CVRA litigation

Evidence

OLC concluded that because the CVRA defines...

Document discusses OLC's specific (and contested) interpretation of when CVRA rights attach.

Document critiques OLC's interpretation of the CVRA as restrictive.

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00023231.jpg

Government Report (likely DOJ OPR/IG Report) • 991 KB
View

This document page (193) details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) legal interpretation that rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) formally commence upon the filing of a complaint, as that establishes a 'Federal offense.' It also outlines the 2005 Attorney General Guidelines, which assigned the responsibility of identifying and notifying victims during the 'investigation stage' to the FBI Special Agent in Charge.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059.jpg

Legal Analysis / Law Review Article / House Oversight Document • 1.68 MB
View

This document is page 80 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) included in House Oversight materials (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059). It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against the OLC's position that victim rights only apply after formal charges are filed. The text outlines specific rights that logically apply pre-charging (protection, conferencing with government attorneys, and fairness/dignity) and cites case law (US v. Rubin) and legislative history to support a broader interpretation of the Act.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017618.jpg

Legal/Academic Document (Likely a Law Journal Article submitted as Evidence) • 2.57 MB
View

This document is a page from a legal article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, likely by attorney David Schoen. It presents a legal argument criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) memorandum for interpreting the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) too narrowly, specifically arguing that victim rights should extend to the pre-charging phase. The text cites various statutes (VRRA) and case law to support the claim that victims have rights to protection and conference with the government before formal charges are filed.

OLC's Other Relationships

Legal representative Jeffrey Epstein
Strength: 6/10 View
Adversarial critical Cassell
Strength: 6/10 View
Interpretive conflict CVRA Drafters
Strength: 5/10 View
Legal representative Congress
Strength: 5/10 View
Adversarial critical David Schoen
Strength: 5/10 View

CVRA's Other Relationships

Legislator proponent Senator Kyl
Strength: 5/10 View
Legislative sponsor advocate Senator Kyl
Strength: 5/10 View
Legislative history Senator Kyl
Strength: 5/10 View
Legislative author proponent Senator Kyl
Strength: 5/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Legal representative
Relationship Strength
7/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:29
Last Updated
2025-11-20 22:10

Entity Network Stats

OLC 13 relationships
CVRA 5 relationships
Mutual connections 0

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship