Relationship Details

US Think Tank Analysts Employment Their Institutions

Connected Entities

Entity A
US Think Tank Analysts
Type: person
Mentions: 0
Entity B
Their Institutions
Type: person
Mentions: 0

Evidence

Analysts feel pressure to protect their institute's funding and access, leading to self-censorship.

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020531.jpg

Congressional Oversight Report • 2.06 MB
View

This document appears to be page 72 of a House Oversight Committee report concerning Think Tanks. It details interviews with various scholars and analysts who admit to varying degrees of self-censorship regarding China (PRC), Xi Jinping, Taiwan, and human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The analysts cite the fear of losing visa access to China and the need to protect their institutions' financial interests or access as primary motivators for modulating their public criticism.

US Think Tank Analysts's Other Relationships

Adversarial transactional Chinese Media (CCTV, Xinhua, CGTN)
Strength: 6/10 View
Professional adversarial PRC Government
Strength: 5/10 View
Influence pressure Chinese Embassy Officials
Strength: 1/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Employment
Relationship Strength
5/10
Medium strength relationship
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 20:21

Entity Network Stats

US Think Tank Analysts 4 relationships
Their Institutions 1 relationships
Mutual connections 0

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship