Relationship Details
US Think Tank Analysts
→
Professional adversarial
→
PRC Government
Connected Entities
Entity A
US Think Tank Analysts
Type: person
Mentions: 0
Entity B
PRC Government
Type: person
Mentions: 0
Evidence
Analysts rely on the PRC for visas/access but fear retaliation for critical speech.
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020531.jpg
Congressional Oversight Report
• 2.06 MB
This document appears to be page 72 of a House Oversight Committee report concerning Think Tanks. It details interviews with various scholars and analysts who admit to varying degrees of self-censorship regarding China (PRC), Xi Jinping, Taiwan, and human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The analysts cite the fear of losing visa access to China and the need to protect their institutions' financial interests or access as primary motivators for modulating their public criticism.
Relationship Metadata
Type
Professional adversarial
Relationship Strength
5/10
Medium strength relationship
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 20:21
Entity Network Stats
US Think Tank Analysts
4 relationships
PRC Government
4 relationships
Mutual connections
0
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship