Relationship Details

The Court Professional The jury

Connected Entities

Entity A
The Court
Type: organization
Mentions: 2003
Entity B
The jury
Type: person
Mentions: 103

Evidence

The document argues that the Court, not the Jury, is responsible for determining which version of the Sentencing Guidelines manual to apply.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010555.jpg

legal document • 718 KB
View

This legal document, filed on June 22, 2022, is a portion of a court filing arguing that the judge (the Court), not the jury, is responsible for determining which version of the Sentencing Guidelines to apply in a case. The filing cites legal precedent from the Second Circuit and the text of the Guidelines themselves to refute the defendant's claim that this factual determination must be made by a jury, particularly regarding the date of an offense for ex post facto considerations.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both The Court and The jury

Ms. Maxwell (person)
Counsel (person)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL (person)
Judge Nathan (person)

The Court's Other Relationships

Legal representative Ms. Sternheim
Strength: 19/10 View
Legal representative Ms. Moe
Strength: 19/10 View
Legal representative Ms. Comey
Strength: 18/10 View
Legal representative Mr. Everdell
Strength: 16/10 View
Legal representative MS. MENNINGER
Strength: 13/10 View

The jury's Other Relationships

Professional the Judge
Strength: 7/10 View
Professional judicial the Judge
Strength: 6/10 View
Professional judicial witnesses
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative The Court
Strength: 6/10 View
Professional Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
Strength: 5/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
5/10
Medium strength relationship
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:45

Entity Network Stats

The Court 255 relationships
The jury 14 relationships
Mutual connections 4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship