Relationship Details

This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.

This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.

This document is a page from a legal affidavit (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the legal strategies and settlements involving Virginia Giuffre, Bradley Edwards, and Alan Dershowitz. The narrator refutes Dershowitz's claims that a previous settlement exonerated him, clarifying that Giuffre stands by her allegations and that the settlement was a tactical decision regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act case. It also explicitly denies Dershowitz's allegations that attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley were involved in an 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner in 2014.