Relationship Details

This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, addresses the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, described as a 'book' or 'household manual' belonging to Epstein and Maxwell. It discusses the defendant's challenge to Alessi's knowledge regarding the exhibit's origins and highlights the manual's contents, which detail practices and relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and other individuals. The document asserts that authentication does not require direct knowledge of creation or seizure, and chain of custody issues pertain to weight rather than admissibility.

This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein from two separate victims. One victim describes being paid for multiple massages that escalated to sexual acts, including Epstein masturbating, and receiving a $200 Christmas bonus from him via Western Union. The affidavit also includes testimony from a second victim, a 16-year-old high school student identified as MD, who was recruited by a fellow student to provide massages for Epstein for money.

This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated July 19, 2006, details the analysis of phone records from February 6, 2005, which confirm calls made by Haley Robson to Epstein's assistant, Sarah Kellen, and Epstein's house on the day a victim was brought there. The report also documents the receipt of a package from attorney Alan Dershowitz, delivered by Atty. Guy Fronstin, containing Myspace profiles of potential witnesses and a letter about Epstein's private investigators allegedly impersonating police. The reporting officer is coordinating with the State Attorney's Office to interview Sarah Kellen and two other potential witnesses, Nada Marcinkova and Janusz Banasiak.

This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. The questioning establishes that the witness received phone calls from Epstein and Sarah Kellen, with Kellen identifying herself as calling on Epstein's behalf. The transcript also details the witness's initial contacts with the government regarding the case, including a meeting in a Florida parking lot around January 4, 2021, and a subsequent phone or video meeting on January 13, 2021.

This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, details the analysis of phone records from February 6, 2005, confirming calls made by Haley Robson around the time a victim was brought to Epstein's house. The report also documents the receipt of a package from attorney Alan Dershowitz containing MySpace profiles of potential witnesses and a letter addressing allegations that one of Epstein's private investigators impersonated a police officer. The officer subsequently contacted the State Attorney's Office to arrange interviews with several individuals, including Sarah Kellen.

This legal document describes a scheme allegedly orchestrated by Epstein to procure underage girls for sexual exploitation. It details the roles of his associates, Ms. Robson as a recruiter and Sarah Kellen as an assistant, in targeting economically disadvantaged girls. The document provides a specific account of a victim, Jane Doe, being brought to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was instructed by Epstein to remove her clothes.

This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, in which an attorney, Ms. Moe, responds to a judge's question about the hierarchy of a criminal conspiracy. Ms. Moe argues that trial evidence shows the unnamed defendant held a leadership position superior to that of Sarah Kellen, who was an assistant to Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. The argument is based on the defendant's role shifting over time and Kellen taking on tasks like calling victims, placing the defendant higher in the scheme's structure.

This legal document, part of an appeal, outlines the court's findings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's supervisory role over Sarah Kellen. It cites testimony from Epstein's pilots and evidence from trial, such as flight logs and Kellen's scheduling of illicit massages under Maxwell's direction, to affirm that Maxwell led Kellen. The document dismisses Maxwell's argument that another person was her assistant, emphasizing that the key issue was Maxwell's exercise of authority over Kellen, not formal job titles.