Relationship Details

This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details allegations of Maxwell's involvement in recruiting and facilitating the sexual abuse of minors by Epstein, specifically mentioning Minor Victim-3 in London (1994-1995) and Minor Victim-4 from Florida (2001-2002). The page also outlines Count Four of the indictment, charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.

This is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that she first traveled to meet Maxwell and Epstein when she was approximately 18, and traveled to see them a total of four or five times. She states that Maxwell was very accommodating and arranged the travel, and confirms that Epstein engaged in sex acts with her during massages at Maxwell's house.

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. The government discusses legal precedents for maintaining grand jury secrecy and updates the court on its progress in notifying victims, particularly those related to the 'Maxwell and Epstein matters'. The government commits to continuing its efforts to contact all relevant victims and to protect the interests of all third parties involved.

This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, dated February 25, 2022, detailing the Government's arguments in a criminal case. It focuses on the alleged enticement and transportation of individuals, specifically 'Jane,' by Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant across state lines to New York for abuse, emphasizing the intent behind these actions as sufficient for a Mann Act violation. The document also mentions the alleged grooming of 'Annie' by the defendant after she had visited Epstein in New York, and the intent of the defendant and Epstein to abuse 'Carolyn' and 'Annie'.

This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination involving a witness named Hesse. The testimony focuses on Hesse's employment history with Maxwell and Epstein, specifically when she started (roughly September 2003) and stopped working for them (around 2004), and that she was hired by Epstein after an interview with Maxwell.

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a submission from the U.S. Government to judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The government discusses legal precedents for grand jury secrecy, notes that Epstein's death is a relevant factor, and details its ongoing efforts to notify all victims before the information is released. The filing is submitted by U.S. Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

This document excerpt discusses a District Court's findings regarding the sentencing of Maxwell, specifically focusing on the application of sentencing guidelines and a leadership enhancement. The court found Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, who was Epstein's 'number two' and 'lady of the house' in Palm Beach, where significant abuse occurred, and noted Maxwell's pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of underaged girls.

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse. The questioning, led by Ms. Moe, first confirms the name 'Carolyn' on an exhibit and then establishes that Mrs. Hesse's job was to work at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not there.

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing overt acts for Counts Three and Five of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists specific allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment involving minors named Jane and Carolyn between 1994 and 2004 in New York and Florida. The document is heavily edited with strike-throughs, notably removing allegations related to victims named Annie and Kate, and adjusting the age of victims from 17 to 18.

This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, arguing that Maxwell was integral to Epstein's operation. The argument uses evidence like FedEx records from 2002 showing Maxwell sending packages from Epstein's office, and corroborates the testimony of a witness, Carolyn, who received packages from Epstein at age 15, using phone messages she left at Epstein's Palm Beach house in 2004.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms having experiences with Epstein and Maxwell, which they first discussed with the media in 2002 and later with the FBI in 2006 or 2007. During the FBI interview, the witness reported that Maxwell had given them a massage and Epstein had gotten into bed with them.

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. During a direct examination, a witness named Kate testifies that Maxwell told her Jeffrey Epstein "needed massages all the time" and that it was "very difficult to keep up." Immediately following this conversation, Kate states that Maxwell led her upstairs to a room containing a massage table.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Jane. Jane testifies that an unnamed male (implied to be Epstein) provided financial support to her and her mother, paying for items like voice lessons and clothes. She also recounts a disturbing conversation with Maxwell, who advised her that once she had a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, they were 'grandfathered in,' implying she could always resume it.

This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. Farmer recounts her last day at a ranch in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell, describing a feeling of disorientation as their interest in her seemed different from the academic support she expected. She details a final conversation where she tried to discuss her studies with Maxwell, who appeared completely disinterested, before saying goodbye to both of them and leaving.

This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.

This court transcript excerpt discusses the supervisory authority of Kellen, an employee, in relation to Maxwell, Epstein, and an unnamed defendant. It details arguments about whether Kellen's actions, such as making calls and scheduling massage appointments, constituted supervisory authority, and mentions testimony from pilots regarding Kellen's reporting structure. The discussion also touches upon a five-point enhancement for sex offenders.

This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a legal argument about whether an individual named Maxwell had supervisory authority over another person named Kellen. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues to the judge that pilot testimony and the fact that someone was present while Kellen scheduled massage appointments is insufficient evidence to prove a supervisory role. The discussion also touches upon sentencing enhancements for sex offenders.

This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes a weekend she spent as a teenager at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell, noting that no other guests were present. She recounts her mixed feelings about the situation and describes her first impression of Maxwell as outgoing and seemingly expecting her arrival.

This legal document addresses Maxwell's argument that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable, detailing evidence of her involvement in transporting Jane for sexual abuse in New York and other conduct in New Mexico. It references allegations that Epstein and Maxwell groomed victims. The document concludes that Maxwell was not unfairly prejudiced and that her above-Guidelines sentence of 240 months' imprisonment was procedurally reasonable.

This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as Farmer. She recounts being gifted expensive cowboy boots and subsequently going to the movies with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer expresses initial hesitation about the movie outing due to a prior negative experience in a New York theater, but states she went because she believed it would be different with Maxwell present.

This legal document argues that the government's claims about when its investigation began were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from Boies Schiller met with AUSA Amanda Kramer on February 29, 2016, to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. Furthermore, it states that David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury, quoting Boies on the extensive evidence they had of a "massive sex trafficking ring."

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on the frequency of her encounters with Epstein and Maxwell at Maxwell's house in London over several years, beginning when she was 17. This followed an incident where Epstein allegedly engaged in sex acts with her during massages at the same location.

This document is a screenshot of a Daily Mail Online news article from January 26, 2022, related to legal case 1:20-cr-00330-RA. It features a photograph from the U.S. District Attorney's Office showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein together. The caption states that Maxwell faced six sex trafficking counts based on the testimony of four victims.

This document is a page of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes her last day at a ranch in New Mexico, recounting a conversation where she tried to discuss her academic work with Maxwell, who seemed completely disinterested. The witness confirms that she said goodbye to both Epstein and Maxwell before leaving the state.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. Farmer testifies about flying home to Phoenix, Arizona, and explains why she did not write about a preceding trip to New Mexico in her journal, stating she wanted to put the events out of her mind. She also explains how she came to keep a pair of boots that were purchased for her by Maxwell and Epstein during that trip.

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against unsealing the grand jury transcripts from the Maxwell case. It asserts that nearly all the information presented to the grand juries is already public record from Maxwell's trial, and the remaining non-public information is minimal and inconsequential. The document concludes that a member of the public familiar with the trial would learn nothing new from the unsealed materials, which do not identify new individuals, clients, or methods related to Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.

This document is a court filing (Page 4 of 6) from April 16, 2019, discussing various allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details claims by 'Ransome' about being recruited as a masseuse, held against her will, and forced into sex by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, leading to a civil lawsuit. The document also describes Epstein's plea deal, which quashed an FBI investigation, and includes a photograph of Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew, with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background, where Roberts claims she was a sex slave and had sex with the prince.

This legal document is a filing arguing against a defendant's motion to dismiss a perjury charge. The prosecution contends that the defendant's false statements in a deposition for the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' civil suit were material, as truthful answers could have corroborated claims that the defendant and Epstein recruited Giuffre and could have led to other victims or witnesses. The filing asserts that the issue of materiality is a question for the jury and should not be decided by the court at this stage.

This legal document argues that the government's representations about when it began its investigation were false. It provides evidence that attorneys from the law firm Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, citing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies details the extensive evidence they claimed to possess about a "massive sex trafficking ring."

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Comey conducting a direct examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony centers on identifying a photograph (Government Exhibit 332) from a CD that was part of the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation.' The witness is also questioned about their familiarity with the appearance of Virginia Roberts.