Relationship Details

CHRISTIAN EVERDELL Co counsel Laura Menninger

Connected Entities

Entity A
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Type: person
Mentions: 625
Entity B
Laura Menninger
Type: person
Mentions: 591

Evidence

Both cc'd on defense team email.

Copied on same defense emails.

Both are defense attorneys on the email chain representing the same interests.

Cc'd on the same defense email

Both are defense attorneys on the email chain coordinating strategy.

Copied on the same defense emails

Everdell forwarding Menninger's email; both representing the defense.

Cc'd on defense filing email.

Copied on defense correspondence.

Both copied on defense side of email chain

Source Documents (10)

EFTA00032602.pdf

Email / Legal Correspondence • 28.2 KB
View

An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.

EFTA00031428.pdf

Email Thread • 78.2 KB
View

This document is an email thread from April 2021 between Defense Counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers (specifically Law Clerk Juan Ruiz Toro). The correspondence concerns a request by the defense to bring electronic devices into the courthouse via the Worth Street entrance for 'evidence views'. The final email confirms that Judge Nathan has signed an order granting permission.

EFTA00015968.pdf

Email Correspondence • 156 KB
View

This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.

EFTA00029574.pdf

Email • 53.2 KB
View

This document is an email thread from November 2021 involving the transmission of Defense Rule 16 Disclosure documents from Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The attachments include certifications from AT&T and FedEx, FedEx invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The thread shows internal USANYS staff coordinating to save these files to a shared drive.

EFTA00023034.pdf

Email Chain • 42.3 KB
View

This document contains an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). An Assistant US Attorney submits a motion to Judge Nathan's chambers to preclude the testimony of a redacted Doctor (expert witness). A subsequent internal email praises the brief as 'fantastic and very convincing' and thanks a colleague for their assistance.

EFTA00031906.pdf

Email Correspondence / Legal Filing • 65 KB
View

This document is an email chain from May 28, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit Ms. Maxwell's Omnibus Reply Memorandum in support of supplemental pretrial motions related to the S2 Superseding Indictment. The memorandum was filed under seal, while the cover letter was filed publicly. The email was subsequently forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS).

EFTA00021769.pdf

Email Chain • 57 KB
View

An email chain from July 2020 involving defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, et al.) discussing a 'Protective Order' for discovery, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by 'GM' in filenames). Everdell sends a revised draft to the Government following a call on July 20th. The top emailer (name redacted) forwards this message expressing confusion, noting they cannot see the difference between the attached documents or find the redline.

EFTA00028571.pdf

Legal Correspondence (Email Chain) • 419 KB
View

This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.

EFTA00027648.pdf

Email Correspondence / Legal Document • 36 KB
View

An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.

EFTA00028585.pdf

Legal Email Correspondence (Discovery Dispute) • 389 KB
View

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both CHRISTIAN EVERDELL and Laura Menninger

MARK S. COHEN (person)
Ms. Sternheim (person)
defendant (person)
Bobbi Sternheim (person)
Bobbi C. Sternheim (person)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL (person)
USANYS (location)
Judge Nathan (person)
ALISON J. NATHAN (person)
Juror 50 (person)

CHRISTIAN EVERDELL's Other Relationships

Client GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 75/10 View
Business associate Bobbi C. Sternheim
Strength: 19/10 View
Legal representative GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 19/10 View
Business associate Laura Menninger
Strength: 11/10 View
Professional GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 10/10 View

Laura Menninger's Other Relationships

Client GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 39/10 View
Legal representative GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 16/10 View
Business associate Jeff Pagliuca
Strength: 14/10 View
Business associate CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Strength: 11/10 View
Co counsel Jeff Pagliuca
Strength: 9/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Co counsel
Relationship Strength
10/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
10
Extracted
2025-12-26 00:14
Last Updated
2025-12-26 13:46

Entity Network Stats

CHRISTIAN EVERDELL 52 relationships
Laura Menninger 42 relationships
Mutual connections 10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship