Relationship Details

This document is a docket sheet page from October 2021 regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a pretrial conference held via telephone on October 21, 2021, attended by the defendant and legal teams. Significant entries include Judge Nathan's order (Doc 364) establishing jury selection protocols, denying a defense request to seal questionnaires, and addressing media opposition to secret proceedings filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 20, 2021, accompanying a production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as statements from individuals the government does not currently plan to call. The letter also clarifies labeling protocols for confidential documents under the Protective Order to avoid confusion with classified material.

This document contains a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Menninger, Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for case 20 Cr. 330. The discussions focus on scheduling physical evidence reviews at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx and electronic evidence reviews at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Key evidence items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts, cash, shredded paper, and thousands of 'highly confidential' nude or partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences.

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.

This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.

This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 19, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion Reply Memorandum and accompanying exhibits under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Other defense counsel, including Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, are copied on the correspondence.

This document is an application for a search warrant and a supporting affidavit filed on July 1, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It seeks to use a cell-site simulator to locate a cellular device (the 'Target Cellular Device') believed to be used by GHISLAINE MAXWELL, who is a subject of an arrest warrant for crimes including conspiracy and enticement/transportation of minors. The FBI has probable cause to believe the device is currently in New Hampshire and that its location will assist in arresting Maxwell, based on prior GPS and cell site data, AT&T records, and contact with her attorney's phone.

A discovery letter dated December 16, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter documents the production of materials designated as confidential, specifically referencing a 'UBS Subpoena Return' dated December 15, 2020. The document indicates ongoing discovery obligations and mentions that physical items are in FBI custody.

This document is a letter dated November 20, 2021, from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of discovery materials. The government provided Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as witness statements for individuals they did not currently intend to call to testify. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under a Protective Order.

This document contains a series of email exchanges between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The correspondence details disputes over the location of the review (FBI Bronx Warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), specifically concerning 'bulky' items such as massage tables, plaster busts, and framed art which the government refused to transport. Significant discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials, including approximately 2,100 nude or obscene electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which required specific viewing conditions on non-networked laptops due to their nature.

This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, concerning the case US v. Maxwell. The initial email features Laura Menninger, defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, submitting a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial to Judge Nathan and requesting redactions to protect client confidentiality under Rule 1.6. Subsequent emails show internal coordination among USANYS prosecutors drafting a response to this motion, which was due by 5 PM that day.

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.

This document contains a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Haddon, Morgan & Foreman; Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence details disputes and arrangements for reviewing 'highly confidential' materials, including over 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, as well as physical evidence stored at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx. Specific items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, a stuffed dog, cash held at Federal Plaza, and various electronic recording media.

This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, concerning the case US v. Maxwell. It details internal communications within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding a draft response to a defense request for a 120 or 180-day trial adjournment. The chain includes an underlying email from Laura Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, submitting the motion to Judge Nathan and arguing for the redaction of other clients' names based on attorney-client privilege rules.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings on November 10 and 11, 2021. It details the scheduling of voir dire, COVID-19 courtroom protocols, and rulings on motions in limine, including the denial of a defense motion to exclude expert testimony on grooming. It also lists the attorneys present for both the prosecution and defense during a pretrial conference.

This document is a court exhibit containing a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses a defamation settlement where Dershowitz paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, despite his claims of vindication and an exonerating investigation by Louis Freeh. The text also references sealed emails and court motions to make these documents public.

This document is an Amended Application, Affidavit, and Warrant from the SDNY dated June 30, 2020, authorizing the FBI to obtain prospective location and pen register information for a cellphone subscribed to 'G Max' (Ghislaine Maxwell) to effect her arrest on sex trafficking charges. The amendment was filed to correct inadvertent errors in a previous affidavit regarding the dates of Maxwell's most recent phone contacts with her sister, Isabel Maxwell, and associate Scott Borgerson. The document establishes probable cause by linking the phone to Maxwell through contacts with her civil attorneys, sister, and financial partner.

This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The emails discuss the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street to review 'Highly Confidential' materials, including 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence also details disputes over the transport of physical evidence from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx, specifically mentioning 'bulky' items like massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, and a stuffed dog, which the government argued were difficult to transport.

This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.

A discovery cover letter dated July 21, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'FedEx Records' (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753552 to SDNY_GM_02759392) which are designated as confidential under a protective order. The document outlines the ongoing discovery obligations of the government.

This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, involving the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Laura Menninger, representing Maxwell, emailed Judge Nathan attaching a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial (120 or 180 days) and requesting permission to redact names of other clients based on professional conduct rules. Subsequent emails between government attorneys discuss a draft response due by 5 PM that same day.

This document is an email chain from March 9, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Laura Menninger submits a letter to Judge Nathan detailing objections to the government's proposed redactions in an Omnibus Response. Subsequent emails in the chain involve coordination between the defense and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the exchange of proposed redactions.

This document contains a chain of legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for her trial. The discussions focus on protocols for accessing 'highly confidential' materials, specifically 2,100 nude or partially nude electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which the government deems obscene and restricts from duplication. The emails also negotiate the transport of physical evidence, including computers, cash, and bulky items like massage tables and plaster busts, from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx to the courthouse at 500 Pearl Street.

This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Laura Menninger, and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing physical and electronic evidence. The discussion focuses on arranging a secure location (500 Pearl Street) for Maxwell and her team to review 'highly confidential' materials, including thousands of images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences, as well as physical evidence stored in an FBI warehouse. The defense raises concerns about access to laptops, the ability to compare physical and electronic evidence, and the specific handling of sensitive materials.

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.

This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.

This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.

This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.

This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article dated April 3, 2019, filed as a court exhibit in Case 1:19-cv-03377. It discusses legal motions to unseal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, noting Epstein's 'valuable consideration' given to the FBI in 2013. It also details Epstein's residency on Little St. James, his sex offender registration status in different jurisdictions, and includes a photo of a woman (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre, though not explicitly captioned in the text).

This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell presents stipulations agreed upon by both parties, including the birth date of Mike Wallace and the opening dates of *The Lion King* on Broadway. The page concludes with the beginning of a written stipulation regarding a witness named 'Kate' attending a meeting with prosecutors in September, listing the full legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense.

This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.

This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article from April 2019, filed as an exhibit in a House Oversight committee record. It details the legal battle between the Miami Herald and Ghislaine Maxwell regarding sealed court documents, mentions Epstein's cooperation with the FBI ('valuable consideration'), and describes his lifestyle and sex offender registration status across different states. It includes quotes from Maxwell's lawyer attacking Virginia Roberts' credibility and a former prosecutor questioning Epstein's lenient treatment.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings from December 16 to December 18, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding witness testimony and jury charges, and correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding prior inconsistent statements and jury instructions. Notably, it records the court's edits to the jury charge, specifically changing the definition of 'a minor' to 'an individual under the age of 18'.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.

This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).

This document is a court docket page from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings from November 10-11, 2021. It details a pretrial conference attended by Maxwell and her legal team, scheduling orders for voir dire (jury selection), and rulings on motions in limine regarding expert testimony on grooming. The document also outlines strict COVID-19 protocols for the courthouse and notes the denial of a defense motion to exclude specific expert testimony.

This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.

This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.

This document is a news article detailing the perspective of a juror, 'Scotty,' from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty explains that the defense team's aggressive tactics, particularly attorney Laura Menninger's questioning of a victim, backfired and helped convince the jury of the defense's lack of respect for the victims. The article also contains a sidebar about a separate, 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York concerning a lawsuit filed by his accuser, Virginia Giuffre.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021. It details the start of the jury trial on November 29, 2021, various filings regarding jury instructions and expert testimony (Dr. Ryan Hall), and orders related to materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The document also notes a court order granting a government request to seal filings to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses.

This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.