The USAO entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007.
Epstein's attorneys asked USAO not to inform victims (footnote 424).
USAO approved counsel for victims whom Epstein would pay; USAO had no objection to Epstein's self-reporting.
USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers
DOJ-OGR-00000172.tif
This document outlines provisions of an agreement related to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal scheme, detailing protections for his employees and female assistants from future criminal charges and immigration proceedings. It also specifies conditions for the USAO to obtain Epstein's computers, ensuring they are safeguarded by Epstein's counsel until the agreement terms are fulfilled.
DOJ-OGR-00023124.tif
This document details aspects of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, including his guilty plea timeline, immunity for co-conspirators, and conditions for federal investigation suspension. It also mentions a concern expressed via email by Lefkowitz to Lourie about media leaks prejudicing Epstein and a New York Post report on Epstein's plea deal from October 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00021458.jpg
This legal document from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation concludes that prosecutors in the Epstein case did not commit professional misconduct by failing to notify victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The OPR's reasoning is that in 2007, when the non-prosecution agreement was signed, the Department of Justice's interpretation was that CVRA rights only attached after federal charges were filed, a standard which was not met. Although finding no misconduct, the report notes that the lack of consultation with victims reflected poorly on the Department and contradicted its mission.
DOJ-OGR-00021472.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing the failure of the USAO (specifically Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman) to coordinate with the State Attorney's Office regarding victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 2008 plea hearing. It reveals that despite a draft letter in December 2007 intended to provide a list of victims to the state, no evidence exists that the letter was sent, leaving state prosecutors (Krischer and Belohlavek) unaware of the federal identified victims. A footnote highlights that Epstein's attorneys explicitly asked the USAO not to inform victims of their rights under state charges.
Entities connected to both USAO and Epstein
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship