Mr. Okula states, "I have spoken with Mr. Gair, and we understand that the procedure is that Mr. Gair is going to call Ms. Conrad," indicating they are coordinating as counsel.
They are opposing counsel (defense and government) who have reached a stipulation together in the case.
They are opposing counsel (defense and government) who have reached a stipulation together in the case.
They are both attorneys in the same court proceeding, likely representing opposing sides, as Mr. Gair moves to admit evidence and Mr. Okula states he has no objection.
DOJ-OGR-00009985.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas. The prosecution and defense agree to a stipulation to enter a witness report (PMD Exhibit 4) and police records (PMD 27) into evidence, avoiding the need for the witness to testify. Following the admission of this evidence, the defense rests its case, and the government proceeds by calling its next witness, Susan Brune.
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00009245.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, by an attorney, Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on a prior court appearance where Conrad, upon being given a financial affidavit to determine her eligibility for a court-appointed lawyer, declared, "This is garbage." Gair probes Conrad's memory, motivations, and the rationality of her statement, which she describes as a "kneejerk reaction."
Entities connected to both MR. OKULA and Mr. Gair
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship