Relationship Details

MR. OKULA Professional Mr. Gair

Connected Entities

Entity A
MR. OKULA
Type: person
Mentions: 182
Entity B
Mr. Gair
Type: person
Mentions: 86

Evidence

Mr. Okula states, "I have spoken with Mr. Gair, and we understand that the procedure is that Mr. Gair is going to call Ms. Conrad," indicating they are coordinating as counsel.

They are opposing counsel (defense and government) who have reached a stipulation together in the case.

They are opposing counsel (defense and government) who have reached a stipulation together in the case.

They are both attorneys in the same court proceeding, likely representing opposing sides, as Mr. Gair moves to admit evidence and Mr. Okula states he has no objection.

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00009985.jpg

Unknown type • 422 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from a hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas. The prosecution and defense agree to a stipulation to enter a witness report (PMD Exhibit 4) and police records (PMD 27) into evidence, avoiding the need for the witness to testify. Following the admission of this evidence, the defense rests its case, and the government proceeds by calling its next witness, Susan Brune.

DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg

legal document • 1.1 MB
View

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.

DOJ-OGR-00009245.jpg

legal document • 1020 KB
View

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, by an attorney, Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on a prior court appearance where Conrad, upon being given a financial affidavit to determine her eligibility for a court-appointed lawyer, declared, "This is garbage." Gair probes Conrad's memory, motivations, and the rationality of her statement, which she describes as a "kneejerk reaction."

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both MR. OKULA and Mr. Gair

Catherine M. Conrad (person)
Conrad (person)
Catherine Conrad (person)
Ms. Conrad (person)
The Court (organization)

MR. OKULA's Other Relationships

Professional Conrad
Strength: 10/10 View
Professional The Court
Strength: 8/10 View
Correspondent Catherine Conrad
Strength: 7/10 View
Professional MS. DAVIS
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative The Court
Strength: 6/10 View

Mr. Gair's Other Relationships

Legal representative The Court
Strength: 7/10 View
Professional Conrad
Strength: 6/10 View
Professional Paul Daugerdas
Strength: 6/10 View
Professional The Court
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Conrad
Strength: 6/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
8/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:19
Last Updated
2025-11-20 15:57

Entity Network Stats

MR. OKULA 38 relationships
Mr. Gair 17 relationships
Mutual connections 5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship