Mr. Okula addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and 'Judge' while making a legal representation in a formal court setting.
Mr. Okula, an attorney, makes objections to the Court during the testimony, demonstrating the standard professional interaction between a lawyer and a judge in a courtroom.
Interaction within a formal court proceeding where THE COURT is the presiding judge and MR. OKULA is counsel.
Mr. Okula, a lawyer, makes objections to the Court during the testimony, which the Court either sustains or overrules.
DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on Conrad's defiance of a previous court order from Judge Pauley to testify, her background as a suspended lawyer, and her mental health. Conrad is evasive, repeatedly stating she is not a psychologist, and provides minimal answers, including claiming she only takes "Water" as medication.
DOJ-OGR-00009382.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Okula, addresses the judge. He clarifies his team's actions after receiving a note, explaining they did not conduct an independent investigation because they deemed it innocuous and assumed the government was performing its own research. Mr. Okula states that he only learned the government had not done this research upon seeing a motion filed by the defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00009253.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It captures the direct examination of a witness or juror named Conrad, who is being questioned about lies told to Judge Pauley during jury selection. Conrad admits to falsely stating they lived at their address their "whole life" and that they owned their residence, explaining they did so because they "thought I would seem more juror marketable."
DOJ-OGR-00010120.jpg
This document is a court transcript filed on March 24, 2022, capturing the end of a hearing. The judge finalizes deadlines with counsel, Mr. Shechtman and Mr. Okula, setting March 23 for initial briefs and April 5 for responses, before thanking them and adjourning the proceedings.
Entities connected to both MR. OKULA and The Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship