Plaintiffs claim that Defendants... are liable... as co-conspirators, aiders, or abettors with al Qaeda.
Plaintiffs claim defendants provided assistance to these terrorists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017925.jpg
This document is page 22 of a Westlaw printout of a 2005 court opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal standards for civil liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), and civil RICO statutes (Section 1962), specifically defining 'material support' for terrorism. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production (possibly related to the Epstein investigation given the context of the request), this specific page discusses 9/11 litigation and does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017872.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. The text focuses on legal arguments for establishing personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), arguing that by assisting Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, the defendants purposefully directed their activities at the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Entities connected to both two other unnamed defendants and al Qaeda
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship