Relationship Details

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Regulator commenter Baker & McKenzie

Connected Entities

Entity A
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
Type: person
Mentions: 0
Entity B
Baker & McKenzie
Type: organization
Mentions: 26

Evidence

Baker & McKenzie submitted comments on the NLRB's proposed rule, which the NLRB considered and ultimately disagreed with.

Baker & McKenzie submitted comments on the NLRB's proposed rule, which the NLRB considered and ultimately disagreed with.

Baker & McKenzie submitted comments on the NLRB's proposed rule, which the NLRB considered and ultimately disagreed with.

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022294.jpg

Federal Register / Rules and Regulations • 3.97 MB
View

This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule on a notice of employee rights. The NLRB explains its decision to exclude 'Beck rights' and other union-specific rights from the notice, while including a detailed list of examples of unlawful employer conduct under the NLRA. The document also addresses comments received from various organizations like Baker & McKenzie during the rulemaking process.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Baker & McKenzie

National Immigration Law Center (person)
Employers (person)

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)'s Other Relationships

Regulatory Employers
Strength: 10/10 View
Commenter agency Baker & McKenzie
Strength: 7/10 View
Dissenting member Brian E. Hayes
Strength: 7/10 View
Commenter agency ALFA
Strength: 7/10 View
Commenter agency National Immigration Law Center
Strength: 7/10 View

Baker & McKenzie's Other Relationships

Proposed conflicting standards National Immigration Law Center
Strength: 7/10 View
Commenter agency National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
Strength: 7/10 View
Commenter on proposed rule The Board (NLRB)
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Employers
Strength: 6/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Regulator commenter
Relationship Strength
7/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 08:18
Last Updated
2025-11-19 08:23

Entity Network Stats

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) 26 relationships
Baker & McKenzie 5 relationships
Mutual connections 2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship