Edwards handled cases for victims; L.M. is a specific victim mentioned in the context of Edwards' defense.
Edwards took E.W. and L.M. with him to the hearing; Edwards filed action to enforce rights of L.M.
Edwards has had a good faith basis to believe... that L.M. was, in fact, a victim
L.M. is identified as 'Edwards's client'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013324.jpg
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010570.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 5) stamped by House Oversight, detailing allegations that Epstein's attorneys were aware of his scheme to recruit minors and worked jointly with U.S. Prosecutors to minimize his civil exposure. It cites an October 3, 2007 email from AUSA Marie Villafaña to Epstein's lawyer Jay Lefkowitz, which includes a draft letter stating that the U.S. government identified 40 victims of Epstein in Palm Beach, describing sexual acts ranging from massage to intercourse. The text also notes Epstein's agreement to not contest jurisdiction for civil damages under 18 USC 2255.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029316.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, likely a brief supporting attorney Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The text argues that Epstein cannot sue Edwards for damages while simultaneously asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege ('sword and shield' doctrine) to avoid answering questions about his sexual abuse of minors, including specific allegations by victims L.M. and Jane Doe. It also reveals that Epstein settled three cases handled by Edwards for confidential amounts that were not of 'minimal value,' contradicting his own claims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013334.jpg
This document outlines the timeline surrounding the violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case during June and July 2008. It details how AUSA Villafaña withheld critical information from victims' attorney Brad Edwards regarding the finality of the plea agreement and its impact on federal prosecution. Consequently, Edwards filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida to enforce the rights of victims E.W. and L.M., who only learned the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008.
Entities connected to both Edwards and L.M.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship