Relationship Details

This document is a page from a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that adverse inferences should be drawn from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer questions during legal proceedings. It lists specific questions Epstein refused to answer regarding procuring minors for prostitution, sexual assaults on private planes, and assaults on victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. The document asserts that the reasonable inference is that these allegations are true and that Epstein's counter-claims against attorney Mr. Edwards were motivated by extortion and malice.

This document is a legal filing (Counts 108 through 156 of a larger complaint) from Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM, filed on July 24, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff L.M. alleges that Jeffrey Epstein committed multiple federal sexual offenses against her, including coercion, prostitution, and sex trafficking of a minor, occurring repeatedly between October 2004 and October 2005. The document concludes with a civil cover sheet demanding a jury trial and damages in excess of $1,000,000.

This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.

This document is page 14 of a legal filing detailing attorney Bradley J. Edwards' representation of Epstein victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe starting in April 2008. It highlights the victims' concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly arranging a plea deal with Epstein without notifying the victims, despite previous assurances in January 2008 that the investigation was ongoing and they would be consulted.