Mr. Cohen represents the defense and Ms. Moe represents the government in the same court case, indicating they are opposing counsel.
Mr. Cohen represents the defense and Ms. Moe represents the government in the same court case, indicating they are opposing counsel.
Mr. Cohen raised a legal argument ('lack of relevance of the statements') to which Ms. Moe, for the government, is providing the counter-position, indicating they are on opposing sides in a legal case.
DOJ-OGR-00001095.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the conclusion of a hearing. The judge rules that the government has proven the defendant is a flight risk and orders the defendant to be detained pending trial. The judge then confirms with both defense counsel (Mr. Cohen) and government counsel (Ms. Moe) that there are no further issues before adjourning the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001080.jpg
This court transcript from April 1, 2021, details a discussion between The Court and Ms. Moe, representing the government, regarding the legal relevance of victim statements in a bail analysis. Following a point raised by Mr. Cohen, The Court seeks the government's position. Ms. Moe clarifies that while victims have a right to participate under the Crime Victims Rights Act, their statements are not part of the government's motion, and their substance should not be considered by the court for the bail analysis.
Entities connected to both MR. COHEN and Ms. Moe
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship