They are opposing counsel in a legal case. The court references Mr. Cohen's arguments, which Ms. Moe is tasked with refuting.
They are both attorneys in the same case, likely on opposing sides, as Ms. Moe is replying to a point seemingly raised by Mr. Cohen's side about 'spins'.
Both are identified as counsel participating in the same court proceeding, representing opposing sides (government and defendant).
They are opposing counsel in a legal case, with Mr. Cohen representing the defense and Ms. Moe representing the government.
They are opposing counsels in a legal proceeding, discussing a case schedule before a judge. They address each other as 'counsel'.
The Court states that Ms. Moe has discussed a 'proposed schedule' with Mr. Cohen, indicating they are opposing counsel or otherwise involved parties in the same legal case who are coordinating on procedural matters.
DOJ-OGR-00001884.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The judge, government counsel Ms. Moe, and defense counsel Mr. Cohen agree to conduct the day's proceedings remotely due to the pandemic. The judge rules that the hearing cannot be delayed, emphasizing the interests of justice and the fact that the detained defendant is seeking release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001025.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding where the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) discuss scheduling. The court sets a trial date for July 12, 2021. The government, through Ms. Moe, requests that the time between the hearing and the trial be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for discovery and motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion between the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) about establishing a schedule for motions and discovery. Mr. Cohen clarifies the schedule by adding a previously omitted August 21 deadline for search warrant applications, which Ms. Moe confirms was included in a prior email to the judge's chambers. The parties are working to finalize deadlines for various legal filings in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001892.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on December 10, 2020, in which the judge questions an attorney, Ms. Moe, about the completeness of discovery materials provided by the F.B.I. in Florida. The judge emphasizes the need for proactive and critical efforts to ensure full disclosure, rather than simply accepting initial representations. The judge then directs Ms. Moe to present a proposed discovery schedule that she has already discussed with another party, Mr. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00001952.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020, detailing a discussion about a defendant's pretrial detention. The judge questions the prosecutor, Ms. Moe, about legal arguments raised by the defense attorney, Mr. Cohen, concerning the burden of proof for flight risk. Ms. Moe argues that the defendant has the burden to rebut the presumption of detention and has failed to do so, justifying the government's request to keep her detained.
DOJ-OGR-00001948.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. In it, a government prosecutor, Ms. Moe of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, argues that the government's presentation is based on undisputed facts from a grand jury indictment, not media 'spin'. She references the indictment's 'chilling' allegations, including the trafficking of underage girls and the defendant's undisputed actions of living in hiding.
Entities connected to both Ms. Moe and MR. COHEN
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship