Relationship Details

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 35) in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It outlines the government's legal arguments against providing additional discovery materials to a defendant named Thomas. The arguments assert that the government has met its obligations, the requested materials are not relevant, and they are not required to collect materials from agencies outside the prosecution team.

This document is Page 2 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in the case against prison guards Thomas and Noel. The court denies Thomas' motion for additional discovery, noting that the Government has already produced significant evidence, including surveillance video dating back to July 5, 2019, count slips, round forms, and staffing rosters covering the period of Epstein's suicide. The text outlines the legal standards (Rule 16, Brady, Giglio) under which Thomas argued for further access to information.

This document is page 6 of a court filing from June 9, 2020, in the case against Thomas (likely regarding Epstein's guards). The Court denies the defendant's request to compel the Government to disclose evidence underlying an Office of Inspector General (OIG) report, accepting the Government's representation that no additional Brady material exists and that the OIG report is not yet drafted. The text cites various legal precedents regarding Rule 16 and Brady obligations.