The document is a legal analysis from Lefcourt's law firm about the legal risks facing 'my client'.
The letter is from Lefcourt's law office and refers to 'the client' on whose behalf the arguments are being made.
The memo is from Lefcourt's law office and repeatedly refers to 'my client' and analyzes legal risks on their behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00030484.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006, analyzes the significant risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida could trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the specific laws and registration requirements in the client's primary residence of the Virgin Islands, secondary domicile of New York, and other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting how different jurisdictions interpret and apply their statutes to out-of-state convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00030477.jpg
This legal memo, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the severe risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida would trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the client's primary residence in the Virgin Islands and secondary domicile in New York, both of which have broad registration statutes, and also notes similar requirements in other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of the plea.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
Entities connected to both GERALD B. LEFCOURT and Unnamed Client
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship