DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
704 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
704 KB
Summary
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| GERALD B. LEFCOURT | Attorney |
Appears in the letterhead of his law office, indicating he is the author or represents the author of the letter.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek |
The recipient of the letter.
|
|
| Unnamed witness | Witness |
The subject of the letter, whose credibility is being challenged based on alleged history of theft, drug use, prostit...
|
| Unnamed client | Client |
The client of Gerald B. Lefcourt's law firm, who is contrasted with the witness and is said to have passed a lie dete...
|
| Unnamed local drug dealer | Drug dealer |
Mentioned in a Florida police report for dropping off the witness at 5:45 a.m.
|
| Unnamed officer | Police Officer |
Described the witness as being 'clearly on drugs' in a police report.
|
| Unnamed witness's parents | Parents |
Mentioned as having a 'criminal history of fraud'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. | Law firm |
Appears on the letterhead as the sender's firm.
|
| The Office | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity investigating a felony, likely a prosecutor's office.
|
| The State | Government entity |
The prosecuting entity in the legal case, whose case is argued to have weakened.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2006-02-16
A meeting where the Office's felony investigation was discussed and the possibility of pleading down to a misdemeanor was indicated.
Gerald B. Lefcourt (or his representative)
Lanna Belohlavek
A scheduled grand jury, four days before which the witness allegedly changed her story about her age.
The witness was found by police in an inappropriate place after running away from home.
Georgia
A Florida police report details the witness being dropped off by a local drug dealer at 5:45 a.m. and being described by an officer as 'clearly on drugs'.
Florida
The client passed a rigorous lie detector test conducted by a highly qualified expert.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the witness was found after running away from home.
|
|
|
The location of a police report detailing the witness being dropped off by a drug dealer.
|
|
|
The city the witness returned to two days before being dropped off by a drug dealer.
|
Relationships (2)
The letter is from Lefcourt's law office and refers to 'the client' on whose behalf the arguments are being made.
Lefcourt is writing to Belohlavek to discuss a legal case, referencing a prior meeting and arguing about the strength of the State's case, which Belohlavek appears to represent.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,044 characters)
LAW OFFICES OF
GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C.
GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C.
Ms. Lanna Belohlavek
June 5, 2006
Page 6
June 5, 2006
Page 6
III. Since the Meeting on February 16, 2006 When Misdemeanor Charges Were Initially discussed, the State's Case has Gotten Considerably Weaker
At the February 16, 2006 meeting, you suggested the Office was investigating a felony and you indicated you would consider pleading it down to a misdemeanor. As you are aware, since then much has happened which makes the alleged case considerably weaker and undermines the credibility of the witnesses upon which it was based. Indeed as you already know the following information has come to light severely damaging the reliability of the witnesses: (i) [REDACTED] background, including a history of theft, confessions and repeated denials of stealing from employers and customers, lying about her age, sexual promiscuity, and prostitution; (ii) [REDACTED] boastful admission of drug use, underage drinking, sexual activity, shoplifting, wild exaggeration of her income (at least $250,000), representing herself naked on a website and as 17 years old, then 16, then 15, only changing it to her truthful age, coincidentally four days before the last scheduled grand jury. In addition, as you have acknowledged, she was found in an inappropriate place in Georgia after the police were called when she ran away from home. This is separate and apart from the Florida police report presented to you, detailing her being dropped off by the local drug dealer at 5:45 a.m., only two days after returning to West Palm Beach, and being described by the officer as clearly on drugs; and (iii) both of [REDACTED] parents' criminal history of fraud.
In stark contrast to this is the fact that, as we indicated at the meeting, the client has passed both a rigorous lie detector test, conducted by the most highly qualified expert we could find, one whose reputation is beyond reproach, and provided you copies of two psycho-sexual evaluations prepared by experts that you have agreed are well-recognized and accepted by the State.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document