Relationship Details

This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Martin Weinberg on March 8, 2011, marked as 'Privileged - Redacted'. Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair article published the same day by Vicky Ward, which details the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, refers to Maxwell as an alleged 'procurer', and revisits Epstein's financial history, past criminal charges, and associations with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Les Wexner.

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, strictly regulates the handling of 'Discovery' materials to protect the privacy of uncharged individuals and prevent leaks to the media or internet. It specifically prohibits Epstein from possessing confidential materials outside the presence of his counsel and mandates that defense teams encrypt digital discovery materials.

This document contains a chain of emails between defense attorney Martin Weinberg and federal prosecutors regarding the indictment and arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics of Epstein's initial court appearance, the unsealing of the indictment, and discussions regarding bail/detention strategies. It also touches upon the execution of a search warrant and the handling of potentially privileged materials.

This document contains an email chain from July 6-7, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, and federal prosecutors regarding the imminent unsealing of the indictment against Epstein. The emails discuss the logistics of Epstein's court presentation at 500 Pearl Street on Monday (July 8), potential bail arguments versus consent to detention, and the execution of a search warrant with concerns regarding attorney-client privilege.

This document is an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) shortly after Epstein's July 2019 arrest. The defense requests the return of items seized from Epstein's person upon arrest, specifically cash and his cellphone. The government agrees to return the cash and personal effects at an upcoming Thursday hearing but refuses to return the electronic devices, stating they have obtained a warrant to search them and will retain them as evidence. Weinberg also mentions providing a list of attorneys for a 'taint prosecutor,' implying a privilege review process.

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between 'Confidential Information' (identifying information of witnesses/victims) and 'Highly Confidential Information' (specifically images of nude or partially-nude individuals). The order mandates that the defendant (Epstein) may only review materials in the presence of counsel, cannot possess copies, and prohibits the dissemination of these materials to the public or internet.

This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.

An email thread dated August 10, 2019 (the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death), instructing recipients to include Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, identified as Epstein's counsel, on any notifications regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. The email also includes a CC to the US Marshals Service (USMS).

This document contains an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, and government prosecutors (names redacted) from July 6-7, 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics for unsealing the indictment against Epstein, his upcoming court presentation at 500 Pearl Street, and discussions regarding bail arguments and search warrant inventories. Weinberg also mentions being with attorney Reid Weingarten.

This document is an official letter dated August 10, 2019, from the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York to Judges Colleen McMahon and Richard M. Berman. It formally notifies the court of the death of Jeffrey Epstein earlier that morning at 7:37 a.m. following an apparent suicide in his cell. The letter notes that the FBI is investigating and an autopsy is pending.

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, between staff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The correspondence confirms that Martin Weinberg has been verified as an attorney in good standing in Massachusetts and is explicitly permitted to visit inmate Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between attorney Martin Weinberg (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ). Weinberg is coordinating the preservation of documents, specifically inquiring about notifying AUSAs in the Southern District of Florida (SD Fla) and other districts. He attaches a 'Supplemental Discovery Letter' and seeks confirmation on whether the recipient will handle the preservation requests or if Weinberg needs to contact the agents/AUSAs directly.

This document is an email chain from July 7-8, 2019, regarding the legal presentment and unsealing of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 Cr. 490). The correspondence discusses scheduling a meeting with Judge Pitman to 'unseal and wheel' the case and confirms Epstein's representation by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten. The emails coordinate the timing for the unsealing order and the formal call-in of the case.

This is a bail disposition and arraignment form from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for Jeffrey Epstein, filed on July 8, 2019. It records his arrest on July 6, 2019, his plea of 'Not Guilty' during arraignment, and orders him detained until a detention hearing scheduled for July 11, 2019. He is represented by retained counsel Martin Weinberg, and the government is represented by AUSA Alex Rossmiller.

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490). The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, establishes strict protocols for handling discovery materials to protect the privacy of victims and uncharged individuals, specifically categorizing some materials as 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' (including nude images). It prohibits the defendant and defense counsel from disseminating these materials to the public or posting them on the internet, and mandates that 'Highly Confidential' materials be reviewed by the defendant only in the presence of counsel.

This document is an official letter dated August 10, 2019, from Warden Lamine N'Diaye of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to Judges McMahon and Berman. The letter formally notifies the court of Jeffrey Epstein's death at 7:37 a.m. that morning, following an apparent suicide in his cell at 6:30 a.m. It mentions that both the FBI and the Office of the Inspector General are investigating the incident.

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. It details urgent communications between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and likely prison or DOJ officials regarding Epstein's detention at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The emails concern Epstein's attorney, Martin Weinberg, being denied entry to the MCC to visit his client before the next day's indictment because he was an out-of-state attorney from Massachusetts; officials subsequently verified his standing to allow the visit.

This document contains an email exchange from July 2019 involving the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A Public Affairs official asks for Jeffrey Epstein's attorney information, and a respondent lists Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and Marc Fernich as the three attorneys who have appeared for him.

This document is an email dated July 12, 2019, from an unidentified sender (likely US Attorney's Office) to an unidentified recipient (likely MCC officials). It serves as a cover letter for a subpoena requesting recordings of Jeffrey Epstein's phone calls and his email correspondence from July 6, 2019, through July 11, 2019. The request explicitly excludes privileged communications with his attorneys Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, and Reid Weingarten.

This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. US Attorney's Office (USANYS) personnel are coordinating to resolve an issue where Epstein's attorney, Martin Weinberg, was denied entry to the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to meet his client because he is barred in Massachusetts (out-of-state). The emails confirm Weinberg's good standing and grant permission for the visit ahead of Epstein's indictment presentment scheduled for the following day.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard Berman, arguing strongly for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The government contends that Epstein presents an extreme flight risk due to his vast wealth (estimated at over $500 million), private jet, and international ties (residences in Paris and Virgin Islands), and poses a danger to the community as a 'serial sexual predator' with a history of witness manipulation. The letter rejects Epstein's proposed bail package—which included house arrest with private security—as inadequate, citing his ability to flee and the severity of the charges which carry a potential life sentence.

This document is a letter filed on July 15, 2019, by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government requests the exclusion of speedy trial time until the next conference on July 18, 2019, noting that defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten) consent to the request.

An email correspondence from July 2019 involving a Captain at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. The email confirms that attorney Martin Weinberg has been verified as being in good standing in Massachusetts and is authorized to visit inmate Jeffrey Epstein, likely in response to issues with counsel meeting the client.

This document is an email thread from July 2019 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely Bureau of Prisons staff. An Assistant United States Attorney requests recordings of inmate Jeffrey Epstein's phone calls and email correspondence from July 6 to July 11, 2019, explicitly excluding communications with his attorneys Marc Fernich, Martin Weinberg, and Reid Weingarten. The top email is an automated 'Out of Office' reply from one of the recipients.

This document contains an email chain between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) regarding a subpoena for Jeffrey Epstein's communications. An Assistant United States Attorney (identified as Maurene) requests email correspondence and phone recordings for inmate Jeffrey Epstein (76318-054) for the period of July 6, 2019, to July 11, 2019, with specific instructions to exclude privileged attorney communications. Adam Johnson, a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the MCC, responds on July 12, 2019, confirming that they 'have no calls or emails for Epstein at this time.'

A letter dated August 12, 2019, from MCC Warden Lamine N'Diaye to Judge Richard Berman regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Warden confirms that ongoing FBI and OIG investigations will cover a specific incident involving Epstein that occurred at the MCC on or about July 23, 2019. Due to these active investigations, the Warden declines to divulge information about a completed internal investigation regarding that same incident.

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman requesting an extension of time to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Bail Motion, citing a lack of financial disclosure from the defense. Judge Berman denied the request via a handwritten note on the document, stating it was 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.'

This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.

This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG), likely from 2009 based on the case number. It lists contact information for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein (Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Joseph Ackerman, and the firm Farmer, Jaffe, et al.) and an attorney representing Scott Rothstein (Marc S. Nurik). The document includes email addresses, physical addresses in Florida and Massachusetts, and phone/fax numbers.

This document is the signature page of a court order from the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 25, 2019. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It shows consent from both the prosecution, represented by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, and the defense, represented by attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.

This is a heavily redacted email dated April 23, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) and Kathy Ruemmler. The email was sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg regarding a matter subject to attorney-client privilege. The entire body of the message has been withheld.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.

This document is an email chain dated April 23, 2015, between attorney Martin Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, and Kathy Ruemmler (with 'dkiesq' CC'd). The subject matter is explicitly marked 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'. The actual content of the messages has been completely redacted under privilege claims, leaving only the header information, legal disclaimers, and contact information for Martin Weinberg's Boston law office.

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.

This document is page 2 of a legal affidavit, likely filed by representatives of the New York Post in December 2018. It details the newspaper's efforts to unseal legal briefs related to an appeal by Jeffrey Epstein, chronicling communications between Post reporter Susan Edelman and the Manhattan DA's office, as well as the affiant's communications with Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Martin Weinberg. The DA's office indicated they would not oppose a petition for a redacted brief.

This document is an email chain from February 2010 in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards an old 2008 email and a critical Palm Beach Post editorial about his plea deal to members of his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr. The repeated subject line indicates Epstein was having trouble with the emails being marked as 'undeliverable'.

An email chain from March 19, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) forwards a message from attorney Martin Weinberg to Kathy Ruemmler. The subject line references 'Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein.' The body of the attorney's email is heavily redacted, and the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.

This document is an email dated April 23, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler, with the subject line "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE". The entire body of the email is redacted, indicating the communication is legally privileged. The email includes a standard confidentiality notice from Weinberg's law office and appears to be from a collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

This document is an email dated January 30, 2015, from Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin Weinberg, to Epstein and Darren Indyke. Weinberg is forwarding a media enquiry from David Pegg, a journalist at The Guardian, regarding an upcoming article that may mention Epstein. Pegg notes that previous attempts to contact Epstein directly have failed and sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015.

An email chain from March 2011 in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a list of interview questions from Alexandra Wolfe (via Peggy Siegal) to his legal team, Martin Weinberg and Darren Indyke. The document is marked privileged. The questions probe sensitive topics including Epstein's relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton, his work during imprisonment, his reaction to his conviction, and the status of his finances (referencing $15 billion).

This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York detailing the initial legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. It covers the filing of the sealed indictment on July 2, his arrest on July 6, and the unsealing of the indictment, initial appearance, arraignment (pleading Not Guilty), and status conference on July 8. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense, as well as the judges assigned to the case.

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters journalist David Ingram to attorney Martin Weinberg, seeking comment on a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump committed rape in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to Kathy Ruemmler with the complaint attached. A significant portion of the communication between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.

This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It details the contact information (addresses, phone numbers, emails) for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein, including Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, and Joseph Ackerman, as well as Marc Nurik representing Scott Rothstein. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by a Reuters reporter asking attorney Martin Weinberg about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email is forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger. The content of the attorneys' discussions is redacted under attorney-client privilege.

This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.

This document contains docket entries for Case 19-2221 (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein) from July 15-16, 2019. It records court appearances by Epstein, his defense team (Weinberg, Weingarten, Fernich, etc.), and government representatives (Comey, FBI Agent Young, NYPD Detective Byrne). Key events include the scheduling of a bail hearing ruling for July 18, 2019, the granting of a speedy trial time exclusion, the filing of transcripts from a July 8 conference, and the admission of Martin Weinberg as counsel Pro Hac Vice.

This document is a printed email chain from April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows this inquiry being forwarded rapidly from Weinberg to Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), and then from Epstein to his legal team (Dershowitz, Black, Goldberger), with subsequent legal discussions redacted for privilege.

This document from April 27, 2016, is an email from attorney Martin Weinberg to his client, Jeffrey Epstein, forwarding a media inquiry. An investigative reporter from Fox News, referred by Alan Dershowitz, requested to arrange an on-the-record interview with Epstein regarding his ties to both the Clintons and Donald Trump.