Relationship Details

This document is a letter motion from the U.S. Department of Justice to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman requesting a stay of the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke' pending the outcome of the criminal prosecution regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that proceeding with civil discovery would prejudice the criminal trial by exposing witnesses, risking harassment, and allowing Maxwell to circumvent criminal discovery limitations. The letter references the June 2020 indictment of Maxwell for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse scheme.

This document is an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) from August 2020, forwarded in March 2021. SDNY officials, supervising the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, request access to scan and review boxes of evidence from the prior SDFL investigation into Jeffrey Epstein stored in West Palm Beach. The SDFL official confirms the materials are in a secure room and references a previous Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) inquiry involving the same documents.

An email chain from April 2020 involving US Attorney Geoffrey Berman discussing specific allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence includes excerpts from a legal complaint and a transcript from 'The Daily' describing an incident at Epstein's New Mexico ranch where Maxwell coerced a minor into a massage and touched her intimately while Epstein watched. Berman questions the explicitness of the media quote compared to the formal complaint.

This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.

This document is a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 2, 2020, announcing the arrest and charging of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details allegations that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to entice, transport, and sexually abuse minors, playing a critical role in grooming victims. The document also notes she is charged with perjury regarding false statements made in 2016 depositions.

An email from the SDNY Attorney's Office providing press guidance for the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial dated November 23, 2021. The document outlines privacy measures for victim witnesses testifying under pseudonyms, details the schedule for the final pretrial conference before Judge Alison Nathan, and provides instructions for media access to exhibits and credentialing.

This document is an email chain from December 2020 between attorney Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and redacted recipients (likely prosecutors). The correspondence concerns the filing of a victim impact statement to oppose Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail. The email includes the full text of the statement, in which the victim describes Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who sexually abused them as a child, groomed victims for Epstein, and poses a significant flight risk.

This document is an internal FBI email chain and travel authorization request (EAN) dated March 8, 2021. It details a request by an FBI Special Agent and a Task Force Officer from the New York Field Office to travel to Durango, Colorado, from March 17-19, 2021. The purpose of the trip was to conduct an in-person interview with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in preparation for Maxwell's trial.

An internal FBI email dated February 18, 2025, from a Special Agent in the Baltimore/Delaware Violent Crime Safe Streets Task Force to an FBI agent in New York. The email clarifies the origins and trial usage of three key items: a 'Masseuses' list found on Epstein's digital device in Manhattan (not used in the Maxwell trial), the 'black book' seized by Miami-Palm Beach authorities, and flight logs provided by Epstein's pilot. It explicitly notes that names on the masseuse list are believed to include minors contacted by Epstein and Maxwell.

This document is the second page of a letter filed on August 6, 2025, by a victim in the Epstein/Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The author expresses deep frustration with the DOJ and FBI regarding the lack of transparency, the sealing of documents, and the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum-security prison. The victim demands access to evidence seized from Epstein's properties, supports Senator Wyden's financial investigation, and questions the official narrative of Epstein's suicide.

This document is page 6 of a court filing from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 22, 2021. It appears to be a proposed jury questionnaire, outlining the charges in Counts Five and Six related to sex trafficking of minors with Jeffrey Epstein between 2001 and 2004. The document also includes questions for potential jurors regarding legal principles like the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt, alongside objections from both the defense and the government concerning the wording and content of these sections.

This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 22, 2022, likely related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. A speaker, Ms. Moe, argues for a harsh sentence, after which a victim, Ms. Farmer, delivers a powerful statement detailing the long-term psychological trauma, including a profound loss of self-trust, resulting from the abuse she suffered from both Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is an FBI Intake record dated November 10, 2020, detailing a call received by the National Threat Operations Center on November 9, 2020. A female victim reported that in 1992, at age 16, she was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell in a New York City park with a job offer, then taken to an office where she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein. The victim noted she had also filed a report with the NYPD.

An anonymous victim impact statement submitted to the court urging against granting bond for Ghislaine Maxwell. The author, who knew Maxwell for over 10 years, describes Maxwell as the primary architect of the abuse ('She was in charge'), detailing her manipulative grooming tactics. The document highlights the author's fear of Maxwell's flight risk due to international connections and recounts a specific incident of witness intimidation involving a death threat against the author's toddler.

This document contains an email chain from December 29-30, 2021, among law enforcement officials (including NYPD's Vice Human Trafficking Unit) celebrating the guilty verdict of Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence highlights the collaboration between local and federal agencies and notes that the investigators received numerous congratulatory calls from the victims of Maxwell and Epstein. The officials express relief at the case's conclusion and hope for a significant sentence for Maxwell.

This legal filing details the government's interactions with Minor Victim-4, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) between 2001 and 2004. It highlights that the defendant personally paid the victim following sexual encounters with Epstein and outlines the victim's interviews with the FBI in 2007 and prosecutors in 2020 and 2021. The document also mentions a photo identification procedure conducted in June 2021.

This document is a formal request from the U.S. Department of Justice (via the U.S. Embassy in London) to the UK Home Office dated August 4, 2021. It requests expedited assistance in obtaining evidence—specifically school records, a birth certificate, and travel records—regarding a victim/witness for the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes the urgency due to the trial scheduled for November 2021 and references the charges related to the sexual exploitation of minors by Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004.

A court transcript page detailing the testimony of a victim who was recruited by a woman named Malyshev with promises of attending FIT. The witness describes 7-8 months of sexual abuse by Epstein and Maxwell in New York and the Virgin Islands, including a suicide/escape attempt. The testimony details the grooming methods used, including leveraging the victim's visa status and family history.

An email chain between USANYS officials dated June 26, 2020, discussing the legal strategy for the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment. The prosecutors debate whether the current language is sufficient to prove the 'interstate travel component' of the charges and whether to include a specific (redacted) name in the indictment.

An email exchange between FBI agents/officials discussion evidentiary items related to Jeffrey Epstein and the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence clarifies the origins of the 'Masseuse List' (seized from Manhattan digital devices), the 'black book' (seized by Miami-Palm Beach), and flight logs (provided by Epstein's pilot). It confirms that these documents contained names of identified minors.

This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at SDNY contacts OPR Counsel to discuss the 'universe of materials' OPR gathered during their review of the 2008 Non-prosecution Agreement between the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein. SDNY seeks this information to determine their discovery obligations in the recently filed case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document contains a series of internal emails from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) dated December 29-30, 2020, discussing case summaries ('blurbs') prepared for the incoming presidential transition team. The emails include draft summaries for two major cases: *United States v. Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS* (Halkbank), involving sanctions evasion, and *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*, regarding her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors. The document outlines the charges, case status, and trial schedules for both matters as they stood in late 2020.

This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.

This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.

This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 600) in the case US v. Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022. It outlines the government's theory that Epstein and Maxwell operated a single criminal conspiracy using a specific 'playbook' to groom vulnerable minors across multiple locations (NY, Palm Beach, NM, USVI). The text cites trial transcripts regarding four specific accusers (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Kate) and describes the targeting of children from single-mother households.

This document is page 75 of a court transcript filed on August 22, 2022, containing a victim impact statement or testimony. The speaker describes how Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein manipulated them, including an incident in the fall of 1995 where Maxwell tracked the speaker down at Bloomingdales. The testimony details how the pair isolated the speaker by causing them to lose their job during a trip to Florida, subsequently trafficking the speaker to their friends.

This document is a federal Search and Seizure Warrant issued on October 27, 2020, authorizing the review of three 'Seagate Path 100' hard drives seized from Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence on July 11, 2019. The warrant seeks evidence of sex trafficking, transportation of minors, and conspiracy covering the period from 1994 to August 8, 2019. It explicitly names Ghislaine Maxwell and a redacted individual as co-conspirators, authorizing the search for communications, financial records, travel plans, and photos related to them and potential victims.

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 6, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive evidence, specifically photographs and documents related to victims of Jeffrey Epstein, to the defense until eight weeks before trial. The government argues this delay is necessary to protect an ongoing investigation and prevent the premature release of sensitive victim information, citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1) as legal justification.

This legal document (Page 4 of a filing from 2015) details the procedural history of complaints against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights the secretive nature of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office, noting that victims were not informed due to a confidentiality provision. The text outlines specific legal actions taken by victims 'Jane Doe No. 1' in 2008 and Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 102) in 2009, explicitly stating Maxwell's role in recruiting Giuffre while she was a minor.

This document is page 35 of a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a diary entry by a victim named Annie, describing grooming behavior by Jeffrey Epstein during a trip to the movies, specifically noting how Epstein touched her and hid the action from a person named Maria. The text mentions Maxwell was not present for this specific New York trip but was involved in subsequent escalation in the spring of 1996.

This document is page 48 of a court filing (Document 621) from February 25, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that the Court should deny Maxwell's Rule 29 motion for acquittal, specifically addressing Count One (conspiracy). The text references testimony from a victim named 'Jane' who stated she was abused by both Epstein and Maxwell in New York and was groomed through methods including 'field trips.'

This document is a page from a court transcript (Charge to the jury) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing specific overt acts committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines incidents from 1996 through 2004 involving three specific victims (referred to as Jane, Annie, and Carolyn), including interstate travel for sexual abuse, unsolicited sexual contact in New Mexico, and the recruitment of minors for paid sex acts at the Palm Beach residence.

This document is an email chain forwarding an official press release from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated July 2, 2020. It announces the arrest and unsealing of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors between 1994 and 1997, as well as perjury charges related to 2016 depositions. The release details the grooming methods used, including financial enticements and normalization of abuse, and includes quotes from high-ranking officials at the SDNY, FBI, and NYPD.

This document is an excerpt from a book containing a legal declaration by Virginia Roberts Giuffre dated January 19, 2015. It details her recruitment by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at age 15, describing sexual abuse at Epstein's Palm Beach home on El Brillo Way and his New York City mansion. The text describes how she was paid $200, promised education and a career, flown on a private jet to New York, and forced into sexual acts.

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The questioning centers on a document from a victims' compensation program in which Farmer identified New York City and New Mexico as locations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion clarifies the specific entries made by the witness on the form.

This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). She details flight logs from May 1997 and April 1998 showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein traveling with a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' (aged 16 and 17 at the times). Ms. Moe argues against the defense's attempt to confuse the jury with photos of an adult assistant also named Jane, citing pilot and DMV testimony to clarify the victim's identity.

This is a memo dated August 5, 2025, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to federal judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The firm, writing on behalf of victim Annie Farmer, responds to a notice about the potential unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The memo strongly criticizes the U.S. Government for not pursuing further criminal investigations, despite admitting there were over a thousand victims, calling this inaction a 'cowardly abdication' of its duties.

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, which began on November 29, 2021. It provides a summary of the case, outlining the six counts against Maxwell related to conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to entice and transport minors for sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The document also reminds the potential juror that Maxwell has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the Government beyond a reasonable doubt.

This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Farmer describes two incidents at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico: a massage where Maxwell was present and Farmer felt fearful that Epstein was watching, and a morning incident where Epstein entered her room, climbed into her bed, and pressed his body against her ('cuddled') without her consent. She testifies that she did not object verbally because she felt isolated on the ranch with 'these two' (Epstein and Maxwell).

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. The Government requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive photographs and documents related to victims of Jeffrey Epstein to the defense until eight weeks before trial, citing risks to an ongoing investigation and victim privacy. The defense counsel has objected to this request.

This document is page 16 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) rejecting the Government's claim that unsealing Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury materials would reveal significant new information. The Court asserts that the grand juries were not used for investigative purposes and heard no testimony from victims, eyewitnesses, or suspects, meeting only for the routine purpose of returning an indictment. The document indicates the filing date as August 11, 2025.

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) details allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors. It describes how Maxwell encouraged victims to perform sexualized massages and accept financial help for travel or education to create a sense of indebtedness. The document explicitly states that Maxwell was sometimes present for and participated in the sexual abuse.

This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, discussing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. The court affirms that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) does not prevent the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The text references a $750,000 fine imposed on Maxwell and cites legal precedent establishing that plea agreements generally only bind the specific district office where they are entered.

This document is a page from a court transcript (filed June 2023, Case 22-1426) arguing for strict punishment for Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details her predatory behavior, specifically highlighting her role in grooming a 14-year-old victim named 'Jane' through shopping and movies before normalizing sexual abuse. It describes specific sexual acts involving Epstein and Maxwell, including Maxwell instructing the child on how to touch Epstein's penis and Maxwell touching the victim's breasts.

This document is Page 3 of a federal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell filed on June 29, 2020. It details the specific methods Maxwell used beginning in 1994 to groom minor victims for Jeffrey Epstein, including befriending them through outings like movies and shopping to build rapport. It alleges Maxwell normalized sexual abuse by discussing sexual topics and being present during undressing or sex acts to put victims at ease.

This document appears to be a page from a victim impact statement or court transcript (Case 22-1426) filed on 06/29/2023. An unnamed survivor describes the long-term psychological effects of their abuse, including isolation, alcoholism, and two suicide attempts. The speaker discusses attending Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in New York, finding solidarity with other testifying victims, and condemns Maxwell as a 'five-star general' of a massive sex-trafficking conspiracy.

This document is a page from a legal filing, likely an indictment, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines a conspiracy between Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others to entice individuals across state lines for illegal sexual activity. The document details specific overt acts, including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with a minor victim in New York and Florida between 1994 and 1997, and the enticement of that same victim to travel for sexual abuse in 1996.

This document is page 12 of a criminal indictment filed on June 29, 2020, against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details charges related to the period between 1994 and 1997, specifically alleging that Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein. It also introduces 'Count Three,' charging Maxwell, Epstein, and others with conspiracy to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.

This document is a page from the government's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe describes how Maxwell and Epstein groomed a victim identified as 'Jane' beginning at a summer camp in 1994 when she was in middle school. The text details the 'older sister' dynamic Maxwell employed, the use of shopping and money, and a specific instance of sexual abuse by Epstein in a pool house.

This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330) filed in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14, knowing they were underage.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The prosecutor details the abuse of a 16-year-old victim named Annie at a remote ranch, describing how Maxwell groomed the victim through sexualized massages to facilitate abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The text specifically recounts an incident where Maxwell groped the victim and a subsequent incident where Epstein entered the victim's bed.

This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues for Maxwell's guilt by recounting the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and 'Annie Farmer'. The summary details how Jane's testimony of sexual exploitation by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein was corroborated, and describes Epstein's initial grooming of a 16-year-old Annie Farmer in 1995, presenting these as part of a consistent 'playbook' of abuse.

This document is page 7 of a court indictment filed on March 29, 2021, detailing allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding the grooming of minors. It specifically outlines the grooming of 'Minor Victim-1,' who was approximately 14 years old when met by Maxwell. The text describes how Maxwell and Epstein befriended the victim between 1994 and 1997 via shopping trips and movies, asked personal questions, and normalized nudity to facilitate sexual abuse.

This document is page 15 of a federal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell (filed July 2, 2020). It outlines 'Count Five' (Perjury), charging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition for a civil case (15 Civ. 7344) when she denied knowing about Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages. It also references the transport of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for illegal sex acts.

This is page 17 of a court filing (Indictment) filed on March 29, 2021, detailing 'Count Five: Sex Trafficking Conspiracy' against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit, entice, and transport minors for sex trafficking. It specifically mentions Maxwell arranging the transport of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for sexual acts with Epstein.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the closing summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The text focuses on a restrictive household manual that warned employees to 'see nothing, hear nothing,' which the prosecution argues was designed to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also highlights a repeating pattern or 'playbook' Maxwell used to exploit multiple victims, specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.

This document is a legal declaration by Robert Y. Lewis, the attorney for victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Lewis outlines his communications with the probation office between May 9 and May 31, 2022, to arrange the submission of Victim Impact Statements for Maxwell's upcoming sentencing. The declaration supports a motion for his clients to speak at the sentencing.

This page from a legal filing (likely a government appellate brief) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable. It details that Maxwell transported a victim named 'Jane' to New York for sexual abuse and that abuse also occurred at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. The document confirms Maxwell's sentence of 240 months imprisonment, which was slightly above the calculated guideline range of 188-235 months.

This is a page from a government legal filing opposing bail for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that despite a lack of specific documentary evidence for every abusive act, the case remains strong due to victim testimony and corroborating documents linking her to Epstein. It further argues for continued detention based on her 'significant foreign ties,' 'millions of dollars in cash' transferred to her spouse, and a 'sophisticated ability to live in hiding.'

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, concerning the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker (likely the judge) describes Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory,' detailing how she recruited and groomed vulnerable minors for Jeffrey Epstein. Specific testimony from a victim named 'Jane' is cited, describing how Maxwell befriended her at age 14, normalized sexual abuse, and instructed her on how to sexually touch Epstein.

This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Count One, charging a conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts between 1994 and 2004. The text alleges Maxwell facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse by recruiting and grooming victims as young as 14.

This document is page 11 of a court filing from April 2022 related to the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It summarizes the Government's arguments regarding Maxwell's consistent 'playbook' of grooming victims (specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate) and her conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein to provide underage girls for abuse. The text details how their methods evolved around 2001 into a 'pyramid scheme' involving payments for massage appointments.

This document is a transcript of a court statement given by Virginia Roberts Giuffre on September 3, 2019. Giuffre identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, recounting how Maxwell recruited her at Mar-a-Lago just before her 17th birthday. She commends the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York for their investigation and expresses hope for justice and accountability for all victims.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, featuring a victim impact statement. The victim details how Epstein and Maxwell used the promise of admission to FIT (Fashion Institute of Technology) to manipulate them, while simultaneously subjecting them to body shaming (calling them a 'piglet'), forced diets (Atkins), and conflicting medical treatments. The victim describes escaping to the U.K. in 2007 and suffering from severe PTSD, anxiety, and depression as a result of the trafficking.

This document is page 14 of a superseding indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Three, charging Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein with conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. It specifically alleges Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sex acts with Epstein.

This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement by Sarah Ransome. Ransome identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking ring, thanks the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York, and urges them to continue their investigation, stating that Epstein did not act alone.

This document is page 184 of a court transcript from the trial USA v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness identified as 'Jane' is under direct examination, describing how casual gatherings at Epstein's house would abruptly turn into orgies initiated by either Epstein or Maxwell. Jane details that Maxwell would undress along with others, while Epstein would get on a massage table, leading to acts including oral sex and intercourse.

This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, alleges that Ghislaine Maxwell, the defendant, facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's access to minor victims for the purpose of sexual abuse. Maxwell is accused of encouraging victims to give Epstein massages, which led to sexual abuse that she sometimes participated in. The document also claims Epstein and Maxwell worked together to make victims feel indebted by offering to pay for travel and educational opportunities.

This document is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Document 122) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Counts One and Three of the indictment are 'clones' because they share identical participants (Epstein and Maxwell), time periods (1994-1997), and operations (enticing minors to travel for abuse). The text specifically details an allegation regarding 'Minor Victim-1' being transported from Florida to New York for sexual abuse at Epstein's New York residence.

This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It accuses her, Jeffrey Epstein, and other unnamed individuals of engaging in a conspiracy from approximately 1994 to 1997 in the Southern District of New York and other locations. The object of the conspiracy was to entice and coerce individuals to travel for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity, in violation of federal law.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 60) of a sentencing hearing, likely for Ghislaine Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues for a harsh sentence to demonstrate that wealth does not place one above the law. Subsequently, a victim named Ms. Farmer begins her impact statement, describing the psychological trauma and loss of self-trust resulting from abuse committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

This page from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution asserts that despite a lack of specific documents naming Maxwell for every instance, the combination of victim testimony and corroborating evidence regarding Epstein makes a strong case. It also highlights Maxwell's flight risk factors, including significant foreign ties, millions in cash transferred to her spouse, and a sophisticated ability to live in hiding.

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) detailing the operational pattern of abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It describes how Epstein traveled from New York to his Palm Beach residence, where victims were greeted by staff or Maxwell, subjected to sexual abuse during 'massages', and subsequently paid in cash by Epstein, Maxwell, or associates. It explicitly states Maxwell facilitated Epstein's access to minors knowing his sexual preferences.

This page from a legal filing (Document 670, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details the government's identification of 32 minor victims, specifically naming Carolyn and Virginia. It describes the 'pyramid scheme' devised by Maxwell and Epstein, noting that victims often coordinated with young personal assistants. The document emphasizes the severe 'Victim Impact,' describing the abuse as a 'recurring nightmare' of sexual abuse and physical violation within 'terrifying mansions.'

This document is a page from the prosecution's summation in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe describes an incident where a victim named Annie hid in a bathroom to avoid sexual advances from Epstein and Maxwell in New Mexico. The text details that after Annie resisted, Maxwell lost interest, though Epstein subsequently paid for Annie to take a summer trip to Thailand, a fact corroborated by her high school boyfriend and mother.

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's residences in Manhattan, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.

This document is a summary of a criminal case for prospective jurors in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, which was set to begin on November 29, 2021. It outlines the six counts against Maxwell, alleging she conspired with and aided Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004 to entice and transport minors for criminal sexual activity and sex trafficking. The document reminds jurors that Maxwell has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the Government beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is page 14 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Three, charging Ghislaine Maxwell with conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The document alleges Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Prosecutor Ms. Moe reads a written statement from an anonymous victim ('Jane Doe') to the court. The statement accuses Ghislaine Maxwell of sadistic manipulation, claiming she was 'in charge,' recruited other victims for amusement, and was essential to Jeffrey Epstein's ability to commit abuse.

This document is page 19 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It details overt acts including Epstein sending a package via FedEx to Minor Victim-4 in Florida in 2002, and Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or employees calling the victim between 2001 and 2004 to schedule massages. The page also introduces Count Six, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor between 2001 and 2004.

This document is page 2 of a Sealed Indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines 'Count One,' charging Maxwell with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview details allegations that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing minor girls as young as 14.

This document is page 6 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 21, 2020, arguing that lawyers Boies and McCawley made prejudicial extrajudicial statements in ABC News interviews regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing quotes the lawyers describing Maxwell as a 'central figure' who 'worked hand-in-hand' with Epstein and suggesting other participants should be worried. The author requests a court order to prohibit further public comments that could damage Maxwell's right to a fair trial.

This document is page 1 of a Superseding Indictment filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Count One, charging her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts between 1994 and 1997. The text alleges Maxwell recruited and groomed victims as young as 14 for Jeffrey Epstein.

This document appears to be page 14 of a criminal indictment filed on July 2, 2020 (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ). It outlines conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell for the transportation of minors (Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2423(a)). The 'Overt Acts' section details specific incidents between 1994 and 1997 where Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly abused 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida.

This page from a legal filing details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on 'Jane Doe 102,' who was lured at age 15 and forced into sex slavery involving politicians, businessmen, and royalty. It mentions a disturbing incident where the victim watched Epstein with three 12-year-old French girls sent to him as a birthday gift by a friend. The document also notes that Epstein paid settlements to over 15 women to avoid civil suits.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 31, labeled SA-400) filed on 06/29/2023. It details legal arguments regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Moe (government) argues that Maxwell acted as the 'lady of the house' and supervised Sarah Kellen, while Mr. Everdell (defense) disputes the government's interpretation of case law regarding the supervision of other criminal participants.

A page from a Miami Herald article (part of a court filing) discussing the private investigation efforts by lawyers representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims. It highlights a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2015, which resulted in a confidential but 'sizable' settlement in 2017. The text criticizes federal authorities in New York for failing to open new investigations despite evidence provided by private investigators.

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details the grooming and abuse methods used by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how Maxwell normalized sexual abuse by discussing sexual topics and being present during sexual acts to put victims at ease. The document also outlines how Maxwell encouraged victims to perform sexualized massages on Epstein and how financial incentives (travel/education) were used to create dependency.

This document is a page from the summation (closing arguments) delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell enticed a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' to travel to New York via plane, using money, gifts, and school payments provided by Epstein as inducement. The text outlines the legal elements of the crime, asserting that Maxwell intended for Jane to engage in criminal sexual activity with Epstein, who was provided access to the underage girl for molestation rather than mentorship.

This document contains pages 136 and 137 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely submitted as evidence to House Oversight), featuring a first-person affidavit from a victim (contextually likely Virginia Giuffre). The text details the victim's trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell between 1999 and 2002 across locations including New York, Palm Beach, Paris, the US Virgin Islands, and Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. The victim describes being 17 years old, being threatened with death or abduction if they left, and observing Epstein's daily abuse of underage girls.

This legal document, filed on July 8, 2020, outlines allegations against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that beginning in at least 1994, Maxwell enticed and groomed multiple minor girls for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The document details the methods used, which included befriending the victims, normalizing sexual abuse, and being present during the acts to make the victims more comfortable.

This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.

This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, detailing the methods used by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to groom and abuse minor victims. It describes how Maxwell facilitated sexualized massages, encouraged victims to accept financial assistance for travel and education to create a sense of indebtedness, and actively participated in sexual abuse incidents. The text explicitly lists specific sexual acts and confirms Maxwell's knowledge of Epstein's preference for underage girls.

This legal document, page 13 of a court filing, outlines overt acts in a conspiracy case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein conspired to transport a minor for sexual activity, detailing specific acts such as group sexual encounters with 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida between 1994-1997 and enticing the same victim to travel from Florida to New York for abuse in 1996.

This document is a page from a court transcript containing the summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that Maxwell and Epstein were not charitable figures but targeted 'pretty, young, vulnerable' girls, specifically citing the testimony of a victim named 'Jane' who was abused in New York at ages 14 through 16. The text includes graphic descriptions of sexual abuse Jane endured at Epstein's New York residence, specifically in the massage room located off the master bathroom.

This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains a victim impact statement written by Virginia Giuffre (referred to as Virginia Roberts by the court) and read by her counsel. The statement directly accuses Maxwell of spotting Giuffre at Mar-a-Lago in the summer of 2000, procuring her for Jeffrey Epstein, and participating in the subsequent abuse.

This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls. The document also references Maxwell's alleged role in transporting 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for Epstein.

This legal document is a letter dated October 6, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests permission to delay the disclosure of sensitive evidence—photographs and documents of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse victims—to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team until eight weeks before trial. The government argues this is necessary to protect an ongoing investigation and sensitive victim information, while noting the defense objects to this request.

This legal document, filed on March 29, 2021, outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein for a scheme running from approximately 2001 to 2004. They are accused of enticing and recruiting minor girls to Epstein's Palm Beach Residence for sexual exploitation, using methods such as cash payments and having employees, including Maxwell, schedule appointments for massages. The document also alleges they paid victims to recruit other girls, thereby creating a network for sexual exploitation.

This page contains a transcript from a court proceeding, filed on July 22, 2022, appearing to be a victim impact statement. The speaker describes the trauma inflicted on their family, specifically detailing the abuse their sister, Maria, suffered at the hands of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights how Maxwell used Maria to access the speaker, threatened Maria to silence her, and lied to the media to shut down investigations.

This document consists of pages 242-243 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the legal conflict between Virginia Roberts (and her lawyers Edwards and Cassell) and Alan Dershowitz, who vehemently denies Roberts' sexual abuse allegations, calling them an extortion plot and threatening her lawyers with disbarment. The text also references Prince Andrew (Duke of York) issuing a denial regarding allegations of sexual contact with minors, and mentions Epstein using 'Trump's resort' for recruitment.

This is page 13 of a federal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, charging Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Count 16 regarding the conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity and lists 'Overt Acts' including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and 'Minor Victim-1' between 1994 and 1997 in New York and Florida.

This document is page 12 (filed as page 13 of 19) of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell filed on July 2, 2020. It details Count Three, alleging that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein and others to transport minors, specifically transporting 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York to engage in illegal sexual acts.

This document is page 38 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 10, 2020. Prosecutor Ms. Moe reads a written statement from an anonymous victim ('Jane Doe') who claims she knew Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. The statement alleges that Maxwell was the primary manipulator in charge, recruiting victims and delivering them to Jeffrey Epstein for abuse.

This document is a page from a legal filing reviewing the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the Government's argument that Maxwell utilized a specific 'playbook' to groom four specific victims (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate) for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a 'pyramid scheme of abuse' beginning in 2001 involving payments for 'massage' appointments.

This document is a page from the direct examination transcript of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness testifies that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was 14, 15, and 16 years old. She confirms three scenarios: abuse by Epstein alone (most frequent), abuse with Epstein and Maxwell present, and abuse with Epstein, Maxwell, and other women. She states that the abuse happened 'pretty much every time' she went to Epstein's house.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor outlines the vulnerability of specific victims (Annie, Kate, Carolyn) due to age, financial struggles, and family issues, arguing that Maxwell and Epstein exploited these needs as part of a predatory 'playbook.' The text describes how the perpetrators isolated these girls at Epstein's ranch and Upper East Side mansion, specifically noting that parents were excluded.

This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) details allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two minor victims. It describes how Maxwell participated in sexualized massages with Minor Victim-1 and facilitated her travel to New York and Florida for abuse. Additionally, it outlines incidents in 1996 in New Mexico where Maxwell groomed Minor Victim-2 (who was under 18) through activities like shopping and movies.

This is a legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from attorney Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to U.S. District Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The letter is written on behalf of victim Annie Farmer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter heavily criticizes the Department of Justice for failing to pursue further criminal investigations and notes that Maxwell is attempting to negotiate a pardon.

This document is page 196 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) testifies on redirect examination about sexualized experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She describes Epstein crawling into bed with her and a separate incident in New Mexico where Maxwell touched her breasts during a massage, stating these actions were a pattern designed to confuse her boundaries for the purpose of sexual abuse.

This document is page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the government has met its burden of proof regarding the six crimes charged against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe specifically refutes the defense's narrative that Maxwell is being blamed for a man's actions, asserting instead that Maxwell made her own choices and committed crimes 'hand-in-hand' with Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330) addressed to Judge Paul Engelmayer, dated August 6, 2025. It argues for strict protocols and heightened caution regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials to protect the privacy and safety of Epstein and Maxwell's victims, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 6(e). A significant footnote highlights that several victims have already died by suicide or overdose and argues that a potential pardon would cause irreparable harm.

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell knowingly transported a minor named 'Jane' (whom she met at a summer camp) across state lines for sexual abuse, emphasizing Maxwell's knowledge of Jane's age (under 17). It also references testimony from a victim named 'Kate' regarding an incident where Maxwell instructed her to wear a schoolgirl outfit for Epstein, establishing Maxwell's knowledge of Epstein's preferences.

This document is a printout of a Daily Mail article dated January 26, 2022, filed as a court exhibit (Case 22-1426). It details an interview with a juror named 'Scotty' who explains that the jury convicted Ghislaine Maxwell because her life was inextricably 'intertwined' with Jeffrey Epstein's, making her fully aware of and culpable for the crimes. The document includes standard webpage elements like ads and comments, along with court filing headers and a DOJ Bates stamp.

This legal document, part of a court filing from July 8, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It accuses Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others of engaging in a conspiracy from approximately 1994 to 1997 in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. The object of the conspiracy was to entice and coerce individuals to travel for the purpose of illegal sexual activity, in violation of federal law.

This document is a page from the government's summation (by Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details the grooming and abuse of a victim referred to as 'Jane,' beginning when she was an 8th grader in 1994 at a summer camp and continuing in Palm Beach. The text describes Maxwell acting as an 'older sister figure' to facilitate abuse and Epstein using scholarship offers as a cover story for Jane's mother before physically abusing Jane in a pool house.

This document is page 167 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. She argues that flight records from March and April 1996 corroborate the prosecution's timeline regarding Epstein and Maxwell traveling to Santa Fe. Additionally, Comey attempts to discredit defense attorney Ms. Menninger's cross-examination of a witness named Jane, characterizing the defense's questioning as misleading 'riddles' and 'nonsense.'

This document is a page from the prosecution's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe outlines the evidence for 'Count Five' (sex trafficking conspiracy spanning 2000-2004), detailing how Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and facilitated Carolyn's sexual abuse in Palm Beach and New York. The prosecutor emphasizes the legal standard for conspiracy, noting that the jury only needs to find that the agreement existed for 'one moment' and that an overt act was taken by either Maxwell or Epstein.

This is page 168 of a legal filing (Document 204) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. The Government argues that perjury counts (Counts Five and Six) should be tried jointly with the sex trafficking counts (Counts One through Four) because they involve the same evidence and separating them would waste judicial resources and traumatize victims by forcing them to testify twice. The text explicitly references Epstein's scheme to abuse underage girls and Maxwell's alleged participation in recruiting girls for sexual massages.

This document is page 68 of a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Moe) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues to the jury that the four key witnesses (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate) are telling the truth about being exploited by Maxwell and Epstein, countering the defense's claims that the women are lying or suffering from false memories. Ms. Moe emphasizes that the witnesses describe the 'same playbook' and that common sense dictates they are not suffering from a 'mass delusion.'

This document is the first page of a sealed indictment filed on June 29, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14.

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell held a leadership role ('lady of the house') over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records to prove they were close associates of Jeffrey Epstein simultaneously. The defense attorney (Mr. Everdell) disputes the government's legal interpretation regarding the supervision of criminal participants.

This page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) summarizes the procedural history and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her conviction on counts of sex trafficking and conspiracy, her acquittal on one count of enticement, and her sentence of 240 months imprisonment plus fines issued by Judge Nathan. The document also begins a 'Statement of Facts' noting that the government established Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein facilitated sexual abuse of minors from 1994 to 2004.

This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing included in an appeal appendix) dated June 29, 2023. The text details the abuse of a victim named Carolyn, stating that Ghislaine Maxwell exploited Carolyn's prior trauma (abuse by a grandfather) to groom her. It explicitly states Maxwell personally touched Carolyn sexually at age 14 and paid her for massages. The speaker (likely the judge) notes that Maxwell and Epstein used this 'playbook' on multiple underage girls.

This document is a page from an indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It describes how Maxwell enticed minor victims, specifically 'Minor Victim-1' (age 14), between 1994 and 1997. The text outlines grooming tactics used by Maxwell and Epstein, including shopping trips and movies, as well as Maxwell normalizing sexual abuse by undressing in front of the victim and being present during abuse.

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell filed on August 10, 2022. The text details an account involving a victim named Annie, stating that Maxwell and Epstein attempted to abuse her ('cuddle') in New Mexico, but she hid in a bathroom, causing Maxwell to lose interest. The prosecutor notes that Epstein subsequently paid for Annie to take a summer trip to Thailand, a fact corroborated by her mother and high school boyfriend, David Mulligan, despite the defense's attempt to use spotty border patrol records to dispute it.

This document appears to be page 6 of a civil complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) filed on September 21, 2015. It details allegations that Ghislaine Maxwell procured underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein and subsequently launched a defamation campaign in January 2015 through her agent, Ross Gow, to discredit victim Virginia Giuffre. The text outlines specific statements made by Maxwell on January 3, 2015, calling Giuffre's claims 'obvious lies' and 'untrue' in an effort to silence exposure of sex crimes.

This document is page 13 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines charges alleging that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell transported a minor, identified as Minor Victim-1, from Florida to New York for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein. It also details COUNT THREE, a conspiracy charge, alleging Maxwell, Epstein, and others conspired to commit these acts.

This document is a summary of the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, provided as part of a juror questionnaire for her trial commencing on November 29, 2021. It outlines the six counts in the indictment, which accuse Maxwell of conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004 to entice, transport, and traffic minors for criminal sexual activity. The document also reminds potential jurors that Maxwell has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent.

This page is a transcript of a closing argument (summation) by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor summarizes evidence regarding Epstein and Maxwell's abuse of minors, specifically mentioning victims Jane, Annie, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn. The text details sexual acts, flight records, and FedEx records (Government Exhibits 801 and 803) proving Epstein sent packages to Carolyn when she was 15.

This document is page 17 of a transcript from the closing summations (Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the vulnerable backgrounds of victims Annie (16), Kate (17), and Carolyn (14), emphasizing financial struggles, sick or alcoholic parents, and prior abuse. The text describes the 'playbook' used by Maxwell and Epstein to exploit these needs and isolate the girls at Epstein's properties, including his ranch and Upper East Side mansion.

This document is page 4 of a legal filing from April 12, 2021, detailing the government's allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines how Maxwell normalized Epstein's abuse, participated in sexual acts with minors as young as 14, facilitated financial dependence, and conspired to transport victims across state lines. It also references perjury charges stemming from false statements Maxwell made during a civil deposition regarding her interactions with minors.

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023, rejecting Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that her prosecution violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. The court argues that because Maxwell herself was not previously prosecuted or punished in the Florida investigation, and because Epstein's previous plea deal does not confer immunity to his co-conspirators, the charges against her stand. The text cites various legal precedents to support the Government's position that co-conspirators are not automatically protected by another's non-prosecution agreement.

This page contains a transcript of a victim impact statement delivered during court proceedings (likely sentencing) for Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker, now a psychologist, describes the long-term professional and personal fear caused by Epstein and Maxwell's threats, and urges Judge Nathan to consider the systemic and ongoing suffering of the victims when determining Maxwell's sentence. The speaker criticizes Maxwell for failing to admit guilt or provide information after her arrest.

This document is page 8 of a civil complaint filed on April 16, 2019, involving Plaintiff Roberts (Giuffre) and Defendant Alan Dershowitz. It outlines factual allegations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, stating that Roberts was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein while under 18 and abused between 2000 and 2002 at various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. The document also lists residential addresses for both Dershowitz and Epstein in New York City.

This legal document, filed on July 8, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that from approximately 1994 to 1997, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein and others in the Southern District of New York to entice individuals to travel for illegal sexual activity, in violation of U.S. federal law (Title 18, Section 2422).

This document is page 11 of a court filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) dated July 2, 2020, detailing statutory allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein conspired to violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422, by enticing and coercing individuals to travel in interstate commerce for illegal sexual activity.

This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor recounts the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and Annie Farmer, to argue for Maxwell's guilt. The summary details how Jane was sexually exploited by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and how Epstein began grooming a 16-year-old Annie Farmer, establishing a pattern of predatory behavior.

This document is a page from a legal filing dated July 2, 2020, outlining overt acts in a criminal conspiracy case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that Maxwell, along with Jeffrey Epstein, conspired to transport minors for illegal sexual activity. Specific allegations include Maxwell and Epstein participating in group sexual encounters with "Minor Victim-1" in New York and Florida between 1994 and 1997, and enticing the same victim to travel from Florida to New York for sexual abuse around 1996.

This legal document, page 10 of a filing dated June 29, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that from approximately 1994 to 1997, Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others conspired in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere to entice individuals to travel for the purpose of illegal sexual activity, in violation of federal law.

This document is a printout of a Daily Mail article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on March 11, 2022. It details statements made by a juror named 'David' following the guilty verdict of Ghislaine Maxwell, where he describes her as a 'predator' who was 'just as guilty as Epstein.' The text also notes legal concerns regarding David's potential failure to disclose being a victim of sexual abuse during jury selection.