Relationship Details

This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 295 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated May 21, 2021, and filed on May 25, 2021. In it, the U.S. Attorney's office, led by Audrey Strauss, concludes its argument by asking the Court to deny the defendant's motions for immediate disclosure of impeachment material related to 'Minor Victim-4'. The prosecution asserts it will provide the material at least six weeks before trial.

This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is the U.S. Government's response regarding a defendant's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. The U.S. Attorney's office argues that the current arrangement, where the MDC and BOP provide the defendant with 65 hours of laptop access per week plus optional weekend desktop access, is sufficient, noting that the trial is still approximately six months away.

This document is an affidavit filed on December 1, 2020, by Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It certifies that the prosecution and defense conferred but failed to reach an agreement regarding the defense's request for the MDC Warden (Tellez) to report directly to the Court on Maxwell's conditions of confinement.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the Acting U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion should be denied, citing the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can assure their presence in court.

This legal document is a filing by the U.S. Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, requesting an extension for producing approximately 1.2 million documents seized from Epstein's residences. The Government asks to move the deadline to November 23, 2020, and to extend the motions schedule. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the request in an order dated November 9, 2020, setting new deadlines for motions into early 2021.

This document is the final page of a court filing (Document 196) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 6, 2021. Submitted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, it concludes a submission to the court by stating the Government's willingness to provide further information and is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys on behalf of U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.

This legal document, dated August 21, 2020, is a submission from the Acting United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys to Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It argues against the defendant's application to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases, asserting that the application lacks legal justification, attempts to circumvent a protective order, and is irrelevant to the civil litigation. The document suggests the defendant's intent is to falsely accuse the Government and another party.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the office of the Acting United States Attorney, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, reiterating the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can ensure their presence in court.

This document is a "Notice of Appearance" filed on August 20, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, on behalf of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, formally notifies the court of her appearance in the case and requests to be added as a Filing User for electronic notifications.

This document is an Affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Pomerantz requests permission to file an unredacted copy of 'Exhibit F' (Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Release) under seal. She notes that the public version was redacted to protect third-party privacy interests and confidential discovery material, but the Government believes the unredacted information is pertinent to the appeal.

A legal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government consents to defense requests to redact the identities of proposed bail cosigners to protect their privacy but objects to holding a sealed 'in camera' hearing for the bail application, citing the public's and victims' right to observe proceedings.

This document is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020. The Government respectfully requests that the Court schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future for them to provide an update on their position regarding the sealing of documents in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The filing is submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her assistants Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.

This document is a legal affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the appeal made by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two prior District Court orders, dated December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, which denied her requests for pre-trial release.

This legal document is the conclusion of a filing by the U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The prosecution argues that the defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, referencing a prior court finding that the defendant “poses a substantial actual risk of flight.” The document asserts that no new information justifies changing this conclusion.

This legal document, dated December 16, 2020, is the conclusion of a filing by the U.S. Attorney's office, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and three assistants. The filing argues against a defendant's renewed motion for bail, citing the Court's previous finding that the defendant is a substantial flight risk and asserting that no new information justifies changing this conclusion.